Exploring 6 years of colorectal cancer surgery in rural Italy: insights from 648 consecutive patients unveiling successes and challenges - Scorecard - MDSpire

Exploring 6 years of colorectal cancer surgery in rural Italy: insights from 648 consecutive patients unveiling successes and challenges

  • By

  • Roberto Santoro

  • Marta Goglia

  • Manuela Brighi

  • Fabio Pio Curci

  • Pietro Maria Amodio

  • Domenico Giannotti

  • Angelo Goglia

  • Jacopo Mazzetti

  • Laura Antolino

  • Antonio Bovino

  • Costantino Zampaletta

  • Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri

  • Enzo Maria Ruggeri

  • April 17, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Analyzing Six Years of Colorectal Cancer Surgical Outcomes in Rural Italy: Findings from 648 Consecutive Cases Highlighting Achievements and Obstacles

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionColorectal cancer (CRC)
Key MechanismsSurgical resection as the only potentially curative treatment; impact of screening (FOBT) enabling earlier diagnosis; perioperative care and surgical techniques including minimally invasive surgery and ERAS protocols
Target PopulationPatients with primary colon or rectal cancer in rural Italian territories
Care SettingTwo district hospitals serving large rural populations in Italy with varying hospital resources and multidisciplinary tumor boards

Key Highlights

  • CRC is the second most diagnosed cancer in Italy with improving 5-year survival rates attributed to multidisciplinary management and screening programs.
  • Rural settings face higher morbidity and mortality rates (4–5%) due to older, fragile patients and emergency presentations despite advances in surgical care.
  • Implementation of laparoscopic surgery and ERAS protocols in rural hospitals shows promise but challenges remain related to hospital resources and patient factors.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening and colonoscopy for early detection of CRC.
  • Preoperative assessment including colonoscopy with biopsy and thoraco-abdominal CT scan.

Management

  • Surgery remains the only potentially curative option for CRC.
  • Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are recommended where feasible.
  • Emergency surgery indicated for acute abdomen due to perforation or obstruction following damage control surgery principles.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Postoperative complications classified by Clavien-Dindo system, monitoring for anastomotic leak, hemorrhage, abscess, wound infection, pulmonary and cardiac complications.
  • Tracking in-hospital morbidity and mortality, reoperation rates, length of hospital stay, and 30-day unplanned readmission.

Risks

  • Higher morbidity and mortality in rural populations due to emergency presentations and fragile elderly patients.
  • Potential disparities in access to state-of-the-art cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment services in rural areas.

Patient & Prescribing Data

648 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for primary colorectal cancer in two rural Italian hospitals.

Laparoscopic surgery and ERAS protocols were progressively implemented; emergency admissions and surgeries were associated with higher risks; multidisciplinary tumor boards supported treatment planning.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Establish multidisciplinary tumor boards including oncology, radiotherapy, pathology, and surgery for coordinated CRC care.
  • Implement and expand CRC screening programs using FOBT and colonoscopy to enable early diagnosis.
  • Adopt minimally invasive surgical techniques and ERAS protocols to improve surgical outcomes.
  • Apply damage control surgery principles in emergency CRC surgeries to enhance patient safety.
  • Monitor postoperative complications systematically using standardized classifications and track key outcomes including morbidity, mortality, and readmissions.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content