Denosumab in multiple myeloma patients with severe renal impairment: a multicenter phase 2 study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

A Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Denosumab for Multiple Myeloma Patients With Severe Renal Impairment

  • By

  • Elizabeth K. O’Donnell

  • Omar Nadeem

  • Jacob P. Laubach

  • Giada Bianchi

  • Andrew R. Branagan

  • Brea C. Lipe

  • Paul G. Richardson

  • Ehsan Malek

  • Robb S. Friedman

  • Ajay K. Nooka

  • Robert Redd

  • Noopur S. Raje

  • Andrew J. Yee

  • November 2, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Phase 2 Study of Denosumab in Multiple Myeloma Patients With Severe Renal Impairment

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMultiple myeloma in patients with severe renal impairment; the study evaluated bone supportive care.
Key MechanismsDenosumab is a RANKL monoclonal antibody used as a bone-modifying agent; serum CTX was assessed as a biochemical marker of bone resorption.
Target PopulationAdults with newly diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma, creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, and ineligibility for bisphosphonate therapy.
Care SettingProspective, open-label, multicenter phase 2 study of denosumab in patients with severe renal impairment.

Key Highlights

  • Twenty-two patients received denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every four weeks for up to 12 cycles; median follow-up was 2.8 years.
  • At three months, median serum CTX decreased by 73% from baseline (n=18; p=0.0002).
  • One-year skeletal-related-event-free survival was 85.4% (95% CI, 71.4–100%); three patients experienced skeletal-related events.
  • Hypocalcemia and infection each occurred in 77.3% of patients across grades. Hypocalcemia was grade 3 or higher in 31.8%; four patients received intravenous calcium.
  • The study was limited by small enrollment and closed early because of slow accrual.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Eligibility required creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, determined using either the CKD-EPI or Cockcroft-Gault equation according to local practice.
  • Before treatment, participants were required to have a 25-OH vitamin D concentration of at least 30 ng/mL.

Management

  • The study administered denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every four weeks for 12 cycles.
  • All patients received calcium supplementation, such as calcium citrate 2000 mg daily, and vitamin D 1000 IU daily.
  • No denosumab dose reductions occurred. Treatment holds were reported for hypocalcemia, dental concerns or osteonecrosis of the jaw, pneumonia, and other reasons; patients held for hypocalcemia restarted on the same schedule after interruption.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The primary endpoint was change in serum CTX from baseline to three months.
  • Hypocalcemia was frequent despite supplementation and adequate baseline 25-OH vitamin D; four patients required intravenous calcium.
  • Osteonecrosis of the jaw or dental concerns led to treatment holds in three patients.

Risks

  • Grade ≥3 hypocalcemia occurred in 31.8% of participants; dialysis patients had a higher observed proportion of grade ≥2 hypocalcemia than those not receiving dialysis (77.8% vs 38.5%; p=0.099).
  • Suspected grade 2 osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred in two patients.
  • Grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 31.8% and infection in 22.7%; the authors noted these events were likely attributable to concomitant multiple myeloma therapy.
  • The study was small, closed early, and included both newly diagnosed and relapsed disease.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Of 24 enrolled adults, 22 received denosumab and were included in outcome analyses. Median age was 68 years, median creatinine clearance was 23.8 mL/min, 41% were receiving dialysis, and 55% had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Patients received a median of 11 doses. Hypocalcemia led to seven treatment holds; the seven patients restarted at the same schedule without dose reduction after a mean interruption of 64 ± 14 days. One patient later had another hypocalcemia-related hold lasting 84 days.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Study protocol: all participants received calcium and vitamin D supplementation and were required to have baseline 25-OH vitamin D ≥30 ng/mL.
  • Observed safety finding: hypocalcemia occurred despite supplementation; some patients received intravenous calcium or had treatment interrupted.
  • Observed subgroup finding: grade ≥2 hypocalcemia occurred in 77.8% of dialysis patients and 38.5% of patients not receiving dialysis; the comparison was not statistically significant (p=0.099).
  • Dental concerns or osteonecrosis of the jaw prompted treatment holds in three patients.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content