The Economic Burden of Chronic Urticaria in Portugal: A Patient-Reported Cost-of-Illness Study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Patient-Reported Costs of Chronic Urticaria in Portugal: A Study of Its Economic Impact

  • By

  • Pedro S. Coelho

  • Jorge M. Mendes

  • João Maia Silva

  • October 14, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Patient-Reported Costs of Chronic Urticaria in Portugal: A Study of Its Economic Impact

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionChronic urticaria (CU), defined as recurrent wheals, angioedema, or both lasting more than 6 weeks; includes chronic spontaneous and chronic inducible urticaria.
Key MechanismsThe study assessed patient-reported direct costs and productivity losses, including presenteeism, and examined their association with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores.
Target PopulationAdults in Portugal reporting a physician-established CU diagnosis from a dermatologist or allergologist/immunologist.
Care SettingPortuguese mixed public–private healthcare context; data were collected through a patient-reported online questionnaire recruited via a patient association and peer forwarding.

Key Highlights

  • After weighting for population severity distribution, estimated annual societal cost was €4,687 per patient.
  • Presenteeism accounted for 62% of estimated societal costs.
  • Patients covered 64% of direct costs themselves.
  • Among employed patients, each one-point increase in DLQI was associated with €270 in annual productivity loss, independent of disease severity.
  • National estimates were described as indicative because prevalence is uncertain and sample representativeness is limited.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The article defines CU as recurrent wheals, angioedema, or both continuing for more than 6 weeks.
  • The study population comprised adults reporting a physician-established diagnosis from a dermatologist or allergologist/immunologist; the excerpt does not state whether diagnoses were independently re-verified.

Management

  • The article states that second-generation H1 antihistamines are first-line treatment, with dose escalation advised before proceeding further.
  • The article identifies omalizumab as the subsequent treatment for CSU unresponsive to antihistamines.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The study assessed health-related quality of life using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
  • The study examined productivity loss among employed patients in relation to DLQI and disease severity.

Risks

  • The article describes CU-related interference with sleep, occupational activity, and social functioning.
  • The authors state that national estimates are indicative because prevalence is uncertain and sample representativeness is limited.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults aged 18 years or older living in Portugal who reported a physician-established CU diagnosis from a dermatologist or allergologist/immunologist.

The article describes second-generation H1 antihistamines as first-line treatment, dose escalation before further treatment, and omalizumab as the subsequent treatment for antihistamine-unresponsive CSU. The study reports that patients bore 64% of direct costs.

Clinical Best Practices

    Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content