The Impact of Bullying and State Policies on Mental Health Issues in Gender-Diverse Adolescents - Scorecard - MDSpire

The Impact of Bullying and State Policies on Mental Health Issues in Gender-Diverse Adolescents

  • By

  • Dylan E. Hughes

  • Sarah L. Zapetis

  • Arianna Mordy

  • Daisy Lopez

  • Vanessa Calderon

  • Laura Adery

  • Rachel Martino

  • Sarah E. Chang

  • Lucina Q. Uddin

  • Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez

  • Richard T. Lebeau

  • Natalia Ramos

  • Lauren C. Ng

  • Katherine H. Karlsgodt

  • Carrie E. Bearden

  • April 21, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: The Impact of Bullying and State Policies on Mental Health Issues in Gender-Diverse Adolescents

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMental health issues including psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents
Key MechanismsMinority stress model involving distal stressors (bullying, discrimination, structural stigma) leading to proximal stressors and mental health challenges; structural stigma via unsupportive policies increases risk
Target PopulationAdolescents aged 9-18 years identifying as transgender and gender diverse (TGD) in the US
Care SettingPediatric and adolescent mental health care, community and school settings, policy and public health frameworks

Key Highlights

  • Prevalence of TGD adolescents doubled from 0.73% in 2017 to 1.43% in 2022 in the US.
  • TGD youths experience higher rates of psychotic spectrum symptoms and psychotic-like experiences compared to cisgender peers.
  • Supportive state policies protect mental health in TGD youths, while unsupportive policies (e.g., bathroom laws) are linked to increased suicide attempts and poorer mental health.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess gender diversity using felt-gender measures to identify TGD youths at risk.
  • Screen for psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) and mental health challenges in TGD adolescents, especially those exposed to bullying or unsupportive policies.

Management

  • Implement interventions to reduce bullying and interpersonal discrimination against TGD youths.
  • Advocate for and support protective state policies that affirm gender identity to improve mental health outcomes.
  • Provide targeted mental health support addressing minority stress and its psychological sequelae.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor mental health symptoms longitudinally in TGD youths, with attention to changes related to policy environment and bullying exposure.
  • Track incidence of suicide attempts and psychotic-like symptoms in relation to structural stigma and interpersonal stressors.

Risks

  • Exposure to bullying and unsupportive state policies significantly increases risk for psychotic-like experiences and suicide attempts in TGD youths.
  • Structural stigma contributes to hypervigilance and paranoid ideation, core features of psychosis.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Transgender and gender diverse adolescents aged 9-18 years in the US

No pharmacologic treatment data provided; emphasis on psychosocial interventions, policy advocacy, and supportive environments to mitigate minority stress and mental health risks.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use validated gender identity assessments to identify levels of gender diversity in adolescents.
  • Incorporate screening for bullying and discrimination experiences in mental health evaluations.
  • Advocate for inclusive and protective policies at school and state levels to reduce structural stigma.
  • Provide trauma-informed care addressing minority stress and its impact on psychosis risk.
  • Engage multidisciplinary teams including mental health providers, educators, and policy advocates to support TGD youths.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content