Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Scorecard: Outcomes of Combined Ventral Rectopexy and Sacrocolpo/Hysteropexy for Multicompartment Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Anatomical and Functional Results
Anatomical distortion of pelvic floor support structures including muscles, nerves, uterosacral-cardinal ligaments, and endopelvic fascia leading to descent of pelvic organs
Target Population
Female patients with multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse, often with coexisting urinary, anorectal, and sexual dysfunction symptoms
Care Setting
Surgical multidisciplinary setting involving minimally invasive laparoscopic or robotic procedures
Key Highlights
Combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy address multicompartment prolapse with improved anatomical and functional outcomes.
Minimally invasive approaches (laparoscopic or robotic) are preferred due to shorter hospital stays and faster recovery.
This combined surgical approach improves urinary, anorectal symptoms and reduces prolapse recurrence compared to isolated procedures.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Assess pelvic organ prolapse using POP-Q system to stage prolapse compartments.
Evaluate functional symptoms including obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI), and urinary incontinence.
Use imaging and clinical examination to identify multicompartment defects involving anterior, posterior, and apical compartments.
Management
Consider combined laparoscopic or robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for patients with multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse.
Avoid suture rectopexy when combined with sacrocolpopexy; use mesh-based minimally invasive techniques.
Perform combined procedures in a multidisciplinary surgical setting to optimize anatomical correction and functional outcomes.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Postoperative follow-up should include assessment of anatomical recurrence defined as POP stage ≥ II by POP-Q.
Monitor for subjective recurrence via patient-reported bulging symptoms.
Evaluate postoperative anorectal function including constipation/ODS and AI/FI symptoms.
Risks
Potential for postoperative complications including serious adverse events (Clavien–Dindo stage ≥ IV).
Risk of prolapse recurrence requiring re-operation in up to 30% of cases.
Mesh-related complications should be monitored given use of synthetic mesh in combined procedures.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Women with symptomatic multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse requiring surgical intervention
Combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy via minimally invasive techniques improve anatomical support and functional symptoms with acceptable safety profile.
Clinical Best Practices
Perform thorough preoperative evaluation including staging of prolapse and assessment of urinary and anorectal symptoms.
Use minimally invasive laparoscopic or robotic approaches for combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy to reduce recovery time.
Adopt a multidisciplinary surgical approach to address all involved pelvic compartments simultaneously.
Employ standardized outcome measures such as POP-Q and validated symptom scores for postoperative assessment.
Monitor patients long-term for anatomical and subjective recurrence and manage complications promptly.
by Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant