Advancing Person-Centered Diabetes Care: Turning Patients’ Priorities Into Action
-
By
-
Megha K. Shah
-
Ambar Kulshreshtha
-
October 19, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Advancing Person-Centered Diabetes Care: Turning Patients’ Priorities Into Action
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Type 2 diabetes (T2D) |
| Key Mechanisms | A patient agenda-setting tool used up to three of 14 conversation cards to identify priorities for discussion during a primary care visit. |
| Target Population | Adults with T2D and HbA1c above 8% enrolled in a federally qualified health center trial. |
| Care Setting | Longitudinal primary care; the QBSafe trial was conducted at a federally qualified health center in New Haven, Connecticut. |
Key Highlights
- In the cluster randomized QBSafe trial, the intervention did not significantly improve illness and treatment intrusiveness, HbA1c, treatment burden, diabetes distress, or quality of life at 6 months.
- Intervention-group clinicians reported greater encounter satisfaction and confidence in addressing patients’ concerns.
- At 6 months, medication adherence was 77.2% in the intervention group versus 64.6% in controls; diabetes medication changes occurred in 33.8% versus 23.2%, respectively.
- Encounter duration did not increase, and cards were discussed during the first half of 88.9% of intervention visits.
- The article describes priority elicitation as a starting point: addressing identified needs may require longitudinal support and broader clinical and community resources.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Management
- Use structured agenda-setting to help patients identify concerns they most want addressed during a primary care visit.
- Integrate patients’ preferences and values into diabetes treatment discussions and decisions.
- Consider agenda-setting tools an entry point to responsive care, with follow-up support from a broader team when needed.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- The trial assessed illness and treatment intrusiveness, HbA1c, treatment burden, diabetes distress, quality of life, medication adherence, and medication changes.
Risks
- The intervention did not significantly improve the primary patient-reported outcome or HbA1c and did not improve treatment burden, diabetes distress, or quality of life at 6 months.
- Eliciting concerns may reveal needs that a clinician cannot address alone because of limited time, expertise, or resources.
Patient & Prescribing Data
The trial enrolled 143 adults with T2D and HbA1c above 8%. At baseline, mean HbA1c was 10%; 72.7% identified as Hispanic, 61.5% reported Spanish as their primary language, 91.3% had household incomes below 150% of the federal poverty level, and one-quarter lacked insurance.
Participants selected up to three of 14 cards covering living with diabetes, treatment burden, competing priorities, symptoms, and other challenges. At 6 months, medication adherence and medication changes were more frequent in the intervention group than in controls, while the measured primary and other patient-reported outcomes and HbA1c did not significantly improve.
Clinical Best Practices
- Invite patients to identify the concern they most urgently want help with before or at the start of the visit.
- Discuss selected priorities early in the encounter; in the trial, cards were discussed during the first half of 88.9% of intervention visits.
- Recognize that identifying a concern does not itself provide the resources needed to resolve it.
- Consider longitudinal support from pharmacists, diabetes educators, behavioral health clinicians, community health workers, or care coordinators, as proposed in the article.
Related Resources & Content
Based on findings from:
The Next Frontier in Person-Centered Diabetes Care—From Asking What Matters to Acting on What Matters
Megha K. Shah, Ambar Kulshreshtha. Jama Network Open, 2026.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2855481
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.