Postoperative periprosthetic fractures associated with compressive osseointegration: a systematic review of the Zimmer Biomet Compress® device - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Systematic Review of Postoperative Periprosthetic Fractures Linked to Compressive Osseointegration with the Zimmer Biomet Compress® Device

  • By

  • Kazuhiko Hashimoto

  • Shunji Nishimura

  • Koji Goto

  • August 22, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Systematic Review of Postoperative Periprosthetic Fractures Linked to Compressive Osseointegration with the Zimmer Biomet Compress® Device

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionPostoperative Periprosthetic Fractures
Key MechanismsCompressive osseointegration via the Zimmer Biomet Compress® device promotes bone hypertrophy but increases fracture risk.
Target PopulationPatients undergoing massive endoprosthetic reconstruction for oncological or traumatic indications.
Care SettingSurgical and postoperative care for limb salvage procedures.

Key Highlights

  • Periprosthetic fractures associated with the CPS device are uncommon, with an overall incidence of 2.7%.
  • Fractures predominantly occur within the first 2 postoperative years.
  • The CPS device's failure profile differs from traditional cemented stems, which fail due to late-onset aseptic loosening.
  • Methodological quality of included studies was moderate, with common weaknesses noted.
  • Comparative analysis with cemented stems requires caution due to differences in study designs.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Monitor for periprosthetic fractures in the first 2 years post-implantation.

Management

  • Consider the unique failure profile of the CPS device when planning surgical interventions.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regular follow-up assessments to evaluate osseointegration and detect early signs of fracture.

Risks

  • Increased risk of periprosthetic fractures at the bone-implant interface due to high compressive forces.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients receiving the CPS device for limb salvage after oncological resection or complex trauma.

Low absolute fracture rates suggest the CPS device may be a viable alternative to traditional cemented implants.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize comprehensive preoperative planning to assess patient suitability for the CPS device.
  • Educate patients on the potential risks and benefits associated with the CPS device.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content