Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses for Myopia Control
-
By
-
Jason Shen
-
Chris Hunt
-
Graeme Young
-
Björn Drobe
-
October 1, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses for Myopia Control
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Clinical topic addressed by the source article: Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses for Myopia Control |
| Key Mechanisms | Mechanisms or clinical associations described in the source article. |
| Target Population | Healthy children aged 6 to 12 years with manifest spherical equivalent refraction from −0.75 to −4.50 D and astigmatism of 1.50 D or less; lenses were dispensed only when cycloplegic SER was ≤−0.50 D, and participants with baseline cycloplegic SER >−0.50 D were excluded postrandomization. |
| Care Setting | Care setting described in the source article. |
Key Highlights
- The double-masked trial randomized participants 1:1 to highly aspherical lenslet (HAL) or single-vision spectacle lenses.
- Randomization was stratified by site, age group, and baseline myopia severity.
- Primary outcomes were changes from baseline in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction and axial length.
- Participants were instructed to wear study spectacles for at least 10 hours daily on 6 days each week.
- Safety assessments included adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, and symptoms, problems, and complaints.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Trial eligibility required manifest spherical equivalent refraction from −0.75 to −4.50 D and astigmatism of 1.50 D or less; lenses were dispensed only when cycloplegic SER was ≤−0.50 D.
Management
- The investigational HAL lens combined a single-vision refractive correction zone with a myopia-control zone containing 11 contiguous highly aspherical lenslet rings.
- The control intervention was a standard single-vision spectacle lens.
- Participants were instructed to wear study spectacles for a minimum of 10 hours per day on 6 days per week.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Cycloplegic autorefraction assessed spherical equivalent refraction annually; axial length was measured every 6 months.
- At each visit, safety assessments included ocular and nonocular adverse events, visual acuity, and symptoms, problems, and complaints.
- Spectacle compliance was monitored by wear frequency and duration.
Risks
- The article states that greater myopia severity is associated with higher risk of pathologic myopia.
- Safety assessments included ocular and nonocular adverse events; the supplied excerpt does not report trial safety results.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Healthy children aged 6 to 12 years with manifest spherical equivalent refraction from −0.75 to −4.50 D and astigmatism of 1.50 D or less; lenses were dispensed only when cycloplegic SER was ≤−0.50 D. Exclusions included previous myopia-control interventions, strabismus, amblyopia, and conditions or medications affecting refractive status.
Clinical Best Practices
- Trial eligibility used cycloplegic refraction to confirm myopia.
- The trial's primary outcomes were changes in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction and axial length.
- Trial safety assessments included visual acuity and ocular and nonocular adverse events.
- The trial monitored spectacle wear frequency and duration.
Related Resources & Content
Based on findings from:
Spectacle Lenses With Highly Aspherical Lenslets for Myopia Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Jason Shen, Chris Hunt, Graeme Young, Björn Drobe. Jama Ophthalmology, 2026.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2852979
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.