Spectacle Lenses With Highly Aspherical Lenslets for Myopia Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses for Myopia Control

  • By

  • Jason Shen

  • Chris Hunt

  • Graeme Young

  • Björn Drobe

  • October 1, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses for Myopia Control

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses for Myopia Control
Key MechanismsMechanisms or clinical associations described in the source article.
Target PopulationHealthy children aged 6 to 12 years with manifest spherical equivalent refraction from −0.75 to −4.50 D and astigmatism of 1.50 D or less; lenses were dispensed only when cycloplegic SER was ≤−0.50 D, and participants with baseline cycloplegic SER >−0.50 D were excluded postrandomization.
Care SettingCare setting described in the source article.

Key Highlights

  • The double-masked trial randomized participants 1:1 to highly aspherical lenslet (HAL) or single-vision spectacle lenses.
  • Randomization was stratified by site, age group, and baseline myopia severity.
  • Primary outcomes were changes from baseline in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction and axial length.
  • Participants were instructed to wear study spectacles for at least 10 hours daily on 6 days each week.
  • Safety assessments included adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, and symptoms, problems, and complaints.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Trial eligibility required manifest spherical equivalent refraction from −0.75 to −4.50 D and astigmatism of 1.50 D or less; lenses were dispensed only when cycloplegic SER was ≤−0.50 D.

Management

  • The investigational HAL lens combined a single-vision refractive correction zone with a myopia-control zone containing 11 contiguous highly aspherical lenslet rings.
  • The control intervention was a standard single-vision spectacle lens.
  • Participants were instructed to wear study spectacles for a minimum of 10 hours per day on 6 days per week.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Cycloplegic autorefraction assessed spherical equivalent refraction annually; axial length was measured every 6 months.
  • At each visit, safety assessments included ocular and nonocular adverse events, visual acuity, and symptoms, problems, and complaints.
  • Spectacle compliance was monitored by wear frequency and duration.

Risks

  • The article states that greater myopia severity is associated with higher risk of pathologic myopia.
  • Safety assessments included ocular and nonocular adverse events; the supplied excerpt does not report trial safety results.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Healthy children aged 6 to 12 years with manifest spherical equivalent refraction from −0.75 to −4.50 D and astigmatism of 1.50 D or less; lenses were dispensed only when cycloplegic SER was ≤−0.50 D. Exclusions included previous myopia-control interventions, strabismus, amblyopia, and conditions or medications affecting refractive status.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Trial eligibility used cycloplegic refraction to confirm myopia.
  • The trial's primary outcomes were changes in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction and axial length.
  • Trial safety assessments included visual acuity and ocular and nonocular adverse events.
  • The trial monitored spectacle wear frequency and duration.

Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content