Pressure point: blood flow restriction exercise and the pain paradox in musculoskeletal injury and persistent pain populations—a narrative review
By
Luke Gray
Luke Hughes
Lynn Kelly
Robert Barker-Davies
Russell Coppack
Nick Caplan
Robyn Cassidy
Sarah Lewis
Alexander Bennett
Peter Ladlow
June 16, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Exploring Blood Flow Restriction Exercise and the Pain Paradox in Musculoskeletal Injuries and Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review
At a Glance
Category Detail
Condition Musculoskeletal injuries and chronic pain
Key Mechanisms Metabolic, vascular, neurological, and psychological pathways
Target Population Individuals with musculoskeletal injuries, particularly those with persistent pain
Care Setting Rehabilitation settings
Key Highlights
BFR exercise can elicit exercise-induced hypoalgesia and comparable strength adaptations at low external loads/intensities. Excessive occlusive pressures may shift the response from hypoalgesia to hyperalgesia, especially in persistent pain populations. BFR exercise effects are pleiotropic and potentially hormetic, requiring individualized prescription.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Consider biopsychosocial factors in the assessment of pain.
Management
Utilize BFR exercise as a rehabilitation tool for musculoskeletal injuries.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Careful prescription and pressure selection are vital to maximize benefits and minimize adverse responses.
Risks
Higher occlusive pressures may provoke hyperalgesia in susceptible individuals.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Individuals with musculoskeletal injuries and chronic pain, particularly those experiencing persistent pain.
BFR exercise may provide analgesic benefits but requires careful monitoring and individualized approaches.
Clinical Best Practices
Assess individual susceptibility to pain modulation before prescribing BFR exercise. Monitor psychological factors that may influence pain responses during rehabilitation.
Related Resources & Content