Influence of virtual dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI on lesion size, BI-RADS scores and reader confidence - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Effects of Virtual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI on Lesion Size, BI-RADS Assessment, and Reader Confidence

  • By

  • Andrzej Liebert

  • Hannes Schreiter

  • Lorenz A. Kapsner

  • Jessica Eberle

  • Chris M. Ehring

  • Dominique Hadler

  • Sabine Ohlmeyer

  • Frederik B. Laun

  • Ramona Erber

  • Julius Emons

  • Michael Uder

  • Evelyn Wenkel

  • Sebastian Bickelhaupt

  • October 17, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Effects of Virtual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI on Lesion Size, BI-RADS Assessment, and Reader Confidence

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBreast lesion assessment using virtual dynamic contrast-enhanced (vDCE) MRI
Key MechanismsDeep learning generates virtual counterparts of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI timepoints from non-contrast breast MRI sequences.
Target PopulationWomen undergoing clinically indicated breast MRI; the retrospective study included 540 women at one centre and a secondary test set of 52 consecutive examinations.
Care SettingClinical breast MRI at University Hospital Erlangen for preoperative assessment, high-risk screening, evaluation for recurrence, and assessment of indeterminate findings.

Key Highlights

  • The study evaluated whether a previously described vDCE approach transferred to data acquired on a scanner not used for model training.
  • The study examined ACR BI-RADS-based assessment in comparison with multiparametric DCE-MRI.
  • The retrospective cohort included 540 women imaged on one 3-T scanner and was randomly partitioned into training (377), validation (81), and holdout test (82) sets.
  • A secondary test set comprised 52 consecutive examinations acquired on another 3-T scanner using a matching protocol.
  • The excerpt describes a multiparametric protocol including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and T1-weighted DCE imaging; it does not specify the DWI b-values or DCE acquisition timing.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The study evaluated ACR BI-RADS-based assessment in comparison with multiparametric DCE-MRI.

Management

  • The article background states that non-contrast techniques may be considered for selected clinical indications and are not proposed as universal substitutes for GBCA-enhanced MRI.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Not reported in the supplied excerpt.

Risks

  • The article background notes costs associated with GBCA administration and research concerns that medically used gadolinium may enter and contaminate surface waters.
  • Patients with breast implants were excluded because distortion artefacts frequently occur on DWI.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Retrospective study of women receiving clinically indicated breast MRI from January 2017 through June 2020; mean age was 52 years (SD 12).

The described DCE protocol used intravenous gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg body weight; the supplied article excerpt does not report study results or prescribing recommendations.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Study protocol and eligibility details, rather than clinical best practices: the excerpt states that cases without histopathological reference data were excluded from the test sets.
  • The excerpt also describes exclusions involving histopathologically confirmed cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy when clinical reports documented no residual findings.

Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content