Cost-effectiveness of Alternative Approaches to Hepatitis C Diagnosis and Treatment Initiation for Treatment-naive People Who Inject Drugs in Australia: A Model-based Economic Evaluation - Scorecard - MDSpire

Cost-effectiveness of Alternative Approaches to Hepatitis C Diagnosis and Treatment Initiation for Treatment-naive People Who Inject Drugs in Australia: A Model-based Economic Evaluation

  • By

  • Christopher R Bailie

  • Nick Scott

  • Alisa E Pedrana

  • Margaret E Hellard

  • Joseph S Doyle

  • August 22, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Economic Evaluation of Various Hepatitis C Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Treatment-Naive Individuals Who Inject Drugs in Australia: A Model-Based Analysis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionHepatitis C virus infection
Key MechanismsDiagnosis via antibody and RNA testing; treatment initiation with direct-acting antivirals
Target PopulationTreatment-naive people who inject drugs attending Australian community primary care settings
Care SettingCommunity primary care and drug and alcohol services in Australia

Key Highlights

  • Reflex laboratory RNA testing on a single sample is the most cost-effective strategy, reducing average cost per treatment completion.
  • Point-of-care testing strategies improve treatment initiation rates but incur higher near-term costs.
  • Immediate treatment initiation based on point-of-care antibody testing is feasible but may increase costs due to treatment of nonviremic individuals.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use sequential laboratory antibody and RNA testing as standard of care, with reflex RNA testing recommended but not yet routine.
  • Consider point-of-care antibody and RNA testing to reduce barriers and improve linkage to care.

Management

  • Initiate treatment promptly after diagnosis, with potential for same-visit treatment initiation in point-of-care settings.
  • Immediate treatment initiation for antibody-positive individuals with follow-up RNA confirmation may be considered.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Confirm active infection with RNA testing following antibody screening.
  • Follow up patients started on immediate treatment to discontinue therapy if RNA negative.

Risks

  • Loss to follow-up due to multiple visits in standard laboratory testing.
  • Higher costs and potential overtreatment with point-of-care immediate treatment strategies.
  • Point-of-care tests may be marginally less accurate than laboratory assays.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Treatment-naive people who inject drugs in Australian community settings

Reflex laboratory RNA testing optimizes cost-effectiveness; point-of-care approaches increase treatment uptake but at higher costs; treatment uptake must increase by at least 16 percentage points to match cost-effectiveness of reflex testing.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement reflex RNA testing on the same sample following antibody positivity to reduce loss to follow-up and costs.
  • Utilize point-of-care testing to improve treatment initiation rates, especially where laboratory access is limited.
  • Consider immediate treatment initiation strategies with confirmatory RNA testing to enhance uptake but monitor for overtreatment.
  • Integrate hepatitis C management into primary care and drug and alcohol services to improve accessibility.
  • Account for local healthcare infrastructure and costs when selecting diagnostic and treatment strategies.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content