Outcomes 10 Years After Implementing an Emergency Department Opt-out Bloodborne Virus Screening Program - Scorecard - MDSpire

Outcomes 10 Years After Implementing an Emergency Department Opt-out Bloodborne Virus Screening Program

  • By

  • Liam Townsend

  • Fiona Herraghty

  • Seán Brennan

  • Conor Grant

  • Wenzhou Wang

  • Anne Moriarty

  • Yvonne Lynagh

  • Lorraine Clancy

  • Antoinette Power

  • Brendan Crowley

  • Suzanne Norris

  • Darragh Shields

  • Colm Bergin

  • September 11, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Ten-Year Results of an Opt-Out Bloodborne Virus Screening Initiative in an Urban Emergency Department

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBloodborne viruses including HIV, hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C (HCV)
Key MechanismsOpt-out screening of ED patients undergoing phlebotomy with combined HIV, HBV, and HCV testing; linkage to care for positive cases
Target PopulationAdult emergency department patients undergoing phlebotomy with intact decision-making capacity
Care SettingUrban tertiary referral hospital emergency department

Key Highlights

  • High acceptance rate of BBV screening among phlebotomized ED patients (81%) sustained over 10 years
  • Significant reduction in PCR-positive HCV diagnoses despite stable rates of new HIV, HBV, and HCV antibody diagnoses
  • High linkage to care rates for newly diagnosed patients: 96% HIV, 89% HBV, 95% HCV

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Offer routine opt-out BBV screening to all adult ED patients undergoing phlebotomy
  • Use combined HIV antibody/antigen, HCV antibody, and HBV surface antigen testing on a single serum sample
  • Perform PCR testing for HCV RNA on all HCV antibody-positive samples unless recently screened

Management

  • Ensure prompt linkage to specialist care for patients with positive BBV diagnoses
  • Repeat screening without restriction to capture new infections and relink lost-to-follow-up patients

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Track acceptance rates and new diagnosis rates longitudinally to assess program impact
  • Monitor linkage to care rates and barriers, especially for patients discharged directly from ED

Risks

  • Potential missed diagnoses if patients decline screening or are not undergoing phlebotomy
  • Risk of loss to follow-up if linkage to care is not maintained, particularly among people who inject drugs

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adult ED patients undergoing phlebotomy in an urban tertiary hospital

High linkage to care achieved for BBV-positive patients supports effectiveness of opt-out screening in facilitating treatment initiation

Clinical Best Practices

  • Integrate BBV opt-out screening into routine ED phlebotomy workflows with electronic health record order sets
  • Provide patient information and verbal consent emphasizing screening as standard care with opt-out option
  • Repeat screening without requiring prior test history to maximize coverage in high-risk populations
  • Focus on linkage to care pathways, especially for patients discharged directly from ED and people who inject drugs

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content