Does femoral stem choice associate with survivorship and clinical outcomes after conversion total hip arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis and novel treatment algorithm - Scorecard - MDSpire

Does femoral stem choice associate with survivorship and clinical outcomes after conversion total hip arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis and novel treatment algorithm

  • By

  • Troy D. Bornes

  • Daniel Alexander Driscoll

  • Christopher G. Anderson

  • Delano R. Trenchfield

  • Mohammed El-Hassan

  • Ittai Shichman

  • Elizabeth B. Gausden

  • Allina A. Nocon

  • Peter K. Sculco

  • February 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Association of Femoral Stem Selection with Patient Outcomes and Longevity Following Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study and Innovative Treatment Protocol

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionProximal femur fractures requiring conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) after failed fracture fixation
Key MechanismsImpact of femoral stem type selection on survivorship, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes post-cTHA
Target PopulationPatients undergoing cTHA after proximal femoral fracture fixation with cephalomedullary nail (CMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS)
Care SettingHigh-volume arthroplasty surgical centers performing conversion total hip arthroplasty

Key Highlights

  • cTHA survivorship is lower and complication rates higher compared to primary THA, resembling revision THA outcomes.
  • Femoral stem types used include uncemented diaphyseal-engaging, uncemented metaphyseal-engaging, and cemented stems, with cemented stems more common in older patients.
  • Prior fracture fixation method and fracture pattern influence femoral stem selection, but impact on survivorship and PROMs remains unclear.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use AO/OTA classification to identify proximal femoral fracture patterns eligible for cTHA.
  • Perform preoperative radiographic evaluation to assess fracture pattern, fixation implant, and signs of osteoarthritis.
  • Evaluate stem fixation and loosening via calibrated radiographs postoperatively.

Management

  • Select femoral stem type (diaphyseal-engaging, metaphyseal-engaging, or cemented) based on patient age, fracture pattern, and prior fixation construct.
  • Consider cemented stems preferentially in older patients.
  • Use posterior approach for cTHA surgery.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor for stem subsidence ≥5 mm on serial radiographs as significant.
  • Assess clinical variables including anterior thigh pain, limp, limb length discrepancy, wound complications, and range of motion at follow-up.
  • Collect patient-reported outcome measures such as HOOS, JR. preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively.

Risks

  • Higher complication rates and lower survivorship compared to primary THA.
  • Worse functional outcomes in patients with prior CMN fixation compared to extramedullary fixation.
  • Potential for stem loosening and subsidence post-cTHA.

Patient & Prescribing Data

51 patients (mean age 73 years, BMI 27.5) undergoing cTHA after proximal femoral fracture fixation

Majority received uncemented diaphyseal-engaging stems; cemented stems used in older patients; dual mobility and standard polyethylene liners equally used; mean follow-up 69 months.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform thorough preoperative radiographic assessment including measurement of stem bypass distance relative to prior screw holes to guide stem choice.
  • Tailor femoral stem selection to fracture pattern, prior fixation method, and patient age to optimize outcomes.
  • Use standardized outcome measures (HOOS, JR.) to evaluate functional recovery post-cTHA.
  • Maintain vigilance for postoperative complications and stem subsidence through regular clinical and radiographic follow-up.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content