Does femoral stem choice associate with survivorship and clinical outcomes after conversion total hip arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis and novel treatment algorithm - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Does femoral stem choice associate with survivorship and clinical outcomes after conversion total hip arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis and novel treatment algorithm
Clinical Scorecard: Association of Femoral Stem Selection with Patient Outcomes and Longevity Following Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study and Innovative Treatment Protocol
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Proximal femur fractures requiring conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) after failed fracture fixation
Key Mechanisms
Impact of femoral stem type selection on survivorship, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes post-cTHA
Target Population
Patients undergoing cTHA after proximal femoral fracture fixation with cephalomedullary nail (CMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS)
Care Setting
High-volume arthroplasty surgical centers performing conversion total hip arthroplasty
Key Highlights
cTHA survivorship is lower and complication rates higher compared to primary THA, resembling revision THA outcomes.
Femoral stem types used include uncemented diaphyseal-engaging, uncemented metaphyseal-engaging, and cemented stems, with cemented stems more common in older patients.
Prior fracture fixation method and fracture pattern influence femoral stem selection, but impact on survivorship and PROMs remains unclear.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use AO/OTA classification to identify proximal femoral fracture patterns eligible for cTHA.
Perform preoperative radiographic evaluation to assess fracture pattern, fixation implant, and signs of osteoarthritis.
Evaluate stem fixation and loosening via calibrated radiographs postoperatively.
Management
Select femoral stem type (diaphyseal-engaging, metaphyseal-engaging, or cemented) based on patient age, fracture pattern, and prior fixation construct.
Consider cemented stems preferentially in older patients.
Use posterior approach for cTHA surgery.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Monitor for stem subsidence ≥5 mm on serial radiographs as significant.
Assess clinical variables including anterior thigh pain, limp, limb length discrepancy, wound complications, and range of motion at follow-up.
Collect patient-reported outcome measures such as HOOS, JR. preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively.
Risks
Higher complication rates and lower survivorship compared to primary THA.
Worse functional outcomes in patients with prior CMN fixation compared to extramedullary fixation.
Potential for stem loosening and subsidence post-cTHA.
Patient & Prescribing Data
51 patients (mean age 73 years, BMI 27.5) undergoing cTHA after proximal femoral fracture fixation
Majority received uncemented diaphyseal-engaging stems; cemented stems used in older patients; dual mobility and standard polyethylene liners equally used; mean follow-up 69 months.
Clinical Best Practices
Perform thorough preoperative radiographic assessment including measurement of stem bypass distance relative to prior screw holes to guide stem choice.
Tailor femoral stem selection to fracture pattern, prior fixation method, and patient age to optimize outcomes.
Use standardized outcome measures (HOOS, JR.) to evaluate functional recovery post-cTHA.
Maintain vigilance for postoperative complications and stem subsidence through regular clinical and radiographic follow-up.
by Troy D. Bornes, Daniel Alexander Driscoll, Christopher G. Anderson, Delano R. Trenchfield, Mohammed El-Hassan, Ittai Shichman, Elizabeth B. Gausden, Allina A. Nocon, Peter K. Sculco