Authors’ response to comments on MAPSE in critical illness: translating prognostic associations into clinical practice
-
By
-
Oscar Cavefors
-
Jonatan Oras
-
October 22, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Authors’ response to comments on MAPSE in critical illness: translating prognostic associations into clinical practice
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) assessment in critically ill patients |
| Key Mechanisms | Reduced MAPSE may reflect differing underlying mechanisms across ICU patients; mitral annular calcification can influence its interpretation. |
| Target Population | A broad, heterogeneous population of critically ill patients in the ICU |
| Care Setting | ICU echocardiographic assessment and prognostic risk stratification |
Key Highlights
- Reduced MAPSE alone is not an indication for inotropic therapy or another specific intervention.
- MAPSE should be interpreted alongside other echocardiographic findings and the patient’s overall clinical assessment.
- Lower MAPSE remained independently associated with 90-day mortality after adjustment for age, SAPS 3, and cardiac index.
- LVEF was no longer associated with mortality after adjustment, and MAPSE measurement was more feasible than Simpson biplane LVEF in this population.
- Subgroup analyses were exploratory, with broad confidence intervals and inconsistent statistical significance after adjustment.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Consider MAPSE as one measure of longitudinal left ventricular function within an integrated echocardiographic assessment.
- Account for mitral annular calcification when interpreting MAPSE.
Management
- Do not use reduced MAPSE as a stand-alone trigger for inotropic support or another intervention.
- Base decisions about inotropic support on the individual patient’s overall haemodynamic and clinical status.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- The clinical value of serial MAPSE assessments beyond a single baseline measurement remains unresolved.
Risks
- Underlying mechanisms associated with reduced MAPSE may differ among ICU patients.
- Subgroup findings are limited by smaller sample sizes, broad confidence intervals, and reduced statistical power.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Critically ill patients in a heterogeneous ICU cohort; patients were not excluded solely because of mitral annular calcification.
The article does not endorse MAPSE-guided treatment. Inotropic support decisions should reflect the patient’s overall haemodynamic and clinical status.
Clinical Best Practices
- Use MAPSE as a potential contributor to risk stratification, not as a stand-alone treatment trigger.
- Interpret MAPSE together with other echocardiographic findings and the global clinical assessment.
- Recognize that mitral annular calcification can affect MAPSE interpretation.
- Further studies could use prespecified aetiological strata, interaction analyses, and serial echocardiographic evaluations to assess variation in MAPSE’s prognostic value and feasibility.
Related Resources & Content
Based on findings from:
Response to: “MAPSE in critical illness: from prognostic association to clinical utility”
Oscar Cavefors, Jonatan Oras. Critical Care, 2026.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-026-06397-9
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.