Response to: “MAPSE in critical illness: from prognostic association to clinical utility” - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Authors’ response to comments on MAPSE in critical illness: translating prognostic associations into clinical practice

  • By

  • Oscar Cavefors

  • Jonatan Oras

  • October 22, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Authors’ response to comments on MAPSE in critical illness: translating prognostic associations into clinical practice

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) assessment in critically ill patients
Key MechanismsReduced MAPSE may reflect differing underlying mechanisms across ICU patients; mitral annular calcification can influence its interpretation.
Target PopulationA broad, heterogeneous population of critically ill patients in the ICU
Care SettingICU echocardiographic assessment and prognostic risk stratification

Key Highlights

  • Reduced MAPSE alone is not an indication for inotropic therapy or another specific intervention.
  • MAPSE should be interpreted alongside other echocardiographic findings and the patient’s overall clinical assessment.
  • Lower MAPSE remained independently associated with 90-day mortality after adjustment for age, SAPS 3, and cardiac index.
  • LVEF was no longer associated with mortality after adjustment, and MAPSE measurement was more feasible than Simpson biplane LVEF in this population.
  • Subgroup analyses were exploratory, with broad confidence intervals and inconsistent statistical significance after adjustment.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Consider MAPSE as one measure of longitudinal left ventricular function within an integrated echocardiographic assessment.
  • Account for mitral annular calcification when interpreting MAPSE.

Management

  • Do not use reduced MAPSE as a stand-alone trigger for inotropic support or another intervention.
  • Base decisions about inotropic support on the individual patient’s overall haemodynamic and clinical status.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The clinical value of serial MAPSE assessments beyond a single baseline measurement remains unresolved.

Risks

  • Underlying mechanisms associated with reduced MAPSE may differ among ICU patients.
  • Subgroup findings are limited by smaller sample sizes, broad confidence intervals, and reduced statistical power.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Critically ill patients in a heterogeneous ICU cohort; patients were not excluded solely because of mitral annular calcification.

The article does not endorse MAPSE-guided treatment. Inotropic support decisions should reflect the patient’s overall haemodynamic and clinical status.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use MAPSE as a potential contributor to risk stratification, not as a stand-alone treatment trigger.
  • Interpret MAPSE together with other echocardiographic findings and the global clinical assessment.
  • Recognize that mitral annular calcification can affect MAPSE interpretation.
  • Further studies could use prespecified aetiological strata, interaction analyses, and serial echocardiographic evaluations to assess variation in MAPSE’s prognostic value and feasibility.

Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content