Second victim syndrome in surgeons: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of adverse events on surgeons - Scorecard - MDSpire

Second victim syndrome in surgeons: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of adverse events on surgeons

  • By

  • James Bryan

  • Adele Ketley

  • Kate Cavanagh

  • Carly Bisset

  • Susan Moug

  • Lynda Wyld

  • Jenna Morgan

  • January 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Exploring Second Victim Syndrome Among Surgeons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Adverse Events on Surgical Practitioners

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSecond Victim Syndrome (SVS) characterized by psychological and psychosomatic effects on surgeons after adverse patient events
Key MechanismsPsychological effects (anxiety, guilt, sadness, sleep disturbance), cognitive effects (burnout, compassion fatigue), and social/spiritual/physical consequences following adverse events
Target PopulationSurgeons involved in adverse patient care events
Care SettingSurgical and healthcare environments where adverse events occur

Key Highlights

  • Most common SVS symptoms among surgeons include anxiety (56.3%), guilt (53.8%), sadness (48.3%), and sleep disturbance (50.5%).
  • Common coping strategies are talking to colleagues (72.5%) and family/friends (52.0%).
  • Sex, surgeon experience level, and severity of adverse event predict the impact of SVS; SVS contributes to burnout and attrition.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Identify psychological and psychosomatic symptoms post-adverse event including anxiety, guilt, sadness, and sleep disturbances.
  • Consider surgeon-specific factors such as sex, experience level, and event severity in assessing SVS impact.

Management

  • Implement multifaceted interventions including peer support and resilience training.
  • Normalize emotional responses and encourage disclosure within institutions.
  • Provide targeted support for at-risk surgeon groups.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor for signs of burnout and attrition among surgeons following adverse events.
  • Assess effectiveness of coping strategies and institutional support mechanisms.

Risks

  • Unaddressed SVS can lead to significant psychological distress, burnout, and workforce attrition.
  • Stigmatization and pathologizing natural emotional responses may hinder help-seeking.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Surgeons experiencing psychological distress after involvement in adverse patient events

Talking to colleagues and family/friends are primary coping methods; institutional peer support and resilience programs are recommended to improve outcomes.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Recognize SVS symptoms early in surgeons following adverse events.
  • Encourage open communication and peer support to facilitate emotional processing.
  • Incorporate resilience training and institutional policies that destigmatize emotional responses.
  • Tailor support interventions based on surgeon demographics and event severity.
  • Monitor for long-term impacts including burnout and attrition.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content