OAGB 2025. A systematic review with meta-analysis of indications and results for primary procedures at 5+ years - Scorecard - MDSpire

OAGB 2025. A systematic review with meta-analysis of indications and results for primary procedures at 5+ years

  • By

  • Mario Musella

  • Sonja Chiappetta

  • Antonio Franzese

  • Pasquale Avella

  • Vincenzo Schiavone

  • Alessandra D’Ambrosio

  • Lucrezia Borrelli

  • Gerardo D’Amato

  • October 2, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) 2025: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Indications and Outcomes After Five Years

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSevere obesity and related metabolic comorbidities
Key MechanismsSingle anastomosis gastric bypass surgery reducing stomach size and altering nutrient absorption to promote weight loss and metabolic improvements
Target PopulationAdults (≥18 years) with severe obesity undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery
Care SettingSpecialized bariatric surgical centers with long-term follow-up capabilities

Key Highlights

  • OAGB is one of the three most commonly performed primary metabolic and bariatric procedures worldwide.
  • Long-term weight loss and metabolic improvements, including significant HbA1c reduction and higher 5-year T2DM remission rates compared to RYGB and SG, are reported.
  • Long-term complications such as bile reflux, malnutrition, vitamin D and iron deficiencies, and marginal ulcers remain concerns, with some patients requiring revisional surgery.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Patient selection should be based on severe obesity and metabolic comorbidities with comprehensive preoperative evaluation.
  • Diagnosis of complications such as GERD and nutritional deficiencies requires ongoing clinical and laboratory assessment.

Management

  • OAGB is endorsed as a safe and effective primary and revisional bariatric procedure by IFSO (2021) and ASMBS (2023).
  • Surgical technique and patient selection should aim to minimize long-term complications.
  • Management of postoperative nutritional deficiencies and reflux symptoms is essential.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Long-term follow-up of at least 5 years is recommended to assess weight loss, metabolic outcomes, and complications.
  • Regular monitoring for nutritional deficiencies (vitamin D, iron) and gastrointestinal symptoms is necessary.
  • Surveillance for marginal ulcers and bile reflux should be included in postoperative care.

Risks

  • Potential for bile reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring conversion to RYGB.
  • Risk of malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies necessitating supplementation and monitoring.
  • Possibility of marginal ulcers and diarrhea impacting quality of life.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults with severe obesity undergoing OAGB as primary or revisional metabolic and bariatric surgery

OAGB provides effective long-term weight loss and metabolic control with a 28% higher 5-year T2DM remission rate compared to other bariatric procedures; however, vigilance for long-term complications is required.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use standardized patient selection criteria focusing on severe obesity and metabolic comorbidities.
  • Ensure comprehensive preoperative counseling regarding benefits and potential long-term risks.
  • Implement rigorous long-term follow-up protocols including nutritional assessment and management.
  • Monitor and manage reflux symptoms proactively to reduce need for revisional surgery.
  • Adopt multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, dietitians, and endocrinologists for optimal outcomes.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content