Real-world response assessment of immune checkpoint inhibition: comparing iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer patients - Scorecard - MDSpire

Real-world response assessment of immune checkpoint inhibition: comparing iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer patients

  • By

  • Christian Nelles

  • Moritz Gräf

  • Pascale Bernard

  • Thorsten Persigehl

  • Nils Große Hokamp

  • David Zopfs

  • David Maintz

  • Nicole Kreuzberg

  • Jürgen Wolf

  • Paul J. Bröckelmann

  • Simon Lennartz

  • September 18, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluation of Treatment Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Comparative Analysis of iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 in Patients with Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMalignant melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Key MechanismsImmune checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 modulate immune response to improve survival; atypical tumor response patterns such as pseudoprogression challenge traditional imaging criteria
Target PopulationPatients with histopathologically proven melanoma or NSCLC treated with CTLA-4 and/or PD-1 inhibitors
Care SettingReal-world clinical setting with routine imaging follow-up

Key Highlights

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve overall and progression-free survival in melanoma and NSCLC.
  • Pseudoprogression is an atypical response pattern under ICI, potentially misclassified as progressive disease by RECIST 1.1.
  • iRECIST was developed to better capture atypical responses and standardize assessment during ICI therapy.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use histopathological confirmation for melanoma or NSCLC diagnosis before ICI therapy.
  • Perform baseline contrast-enhanced CT of chest and abdomen within 12 weeks prior to ICI initiation.

Management

  • Treat patients with CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab, PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab or pembrolizumab, or combination therapy.
  • Avoid concurrent chemotherapy or radiation during the observed ICI treatment period.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Conduct at least two follow-up contrast-enhanced CT scans of chest and abdomen during or shortly after ICI therapy.
  • Evaluate treatment response using both RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST criteria to identify atypical response patterns.
  • Confirm progressive disease under iRECIST (iCPD) before treatment discontinuation to avoid premature cessation.

Risks

  • Potential misclassification of pseudoprogression as progressive disease by RECIST 1.1 may lead to premature treatment discontinuation.
  • Ambiguity in immune-related response criteria (irRECIST) can cause inconsistent PD confirmation across studies.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with melanoma or NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors without concurrent chemotherapy or radiation

ICI therapy shows improved survival; response evaluation requires criteria sensitive to atypical patterns like pseudoprogression to optimize treatment continuation decisions.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate iRECIST alongside RECIST 1.1 for comprehensive assessment of ICI treatment response.
  • Use experienced radiologists and consensus review for ambiguous imaging evaluations.
  • Maintain standardized imaging protocols with contrast-enhanced CT scans for consistent response monitoring.
  • Recognize and account for atypical response patterns such as pseudoprogression to prevent premature therapy discontinuation.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content