The impact of sociodemographic background on clinical presentation of high-grade gliomas: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire

The impact of sociodemographic background on clinical presentation of high-grade gliomas: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis

  • By

  • Sayak R. Ghosh

  • Anne R. Lally

  • Isabella L. Pecorari

  • Joshua Reynolds

  • Alexander Ledet

  • Sabrina Begley

  • Elizabeth Juarez Diaz

  • Eric Zhu

  • Karan Joseph

  • Kyle McGeehan MPhil

  • Michael Schulder

  • Tanner Johanns

  • Yonah C. Ziemba

  • Vijay Agarwal

  • March 25, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Influence of Sociodemographic Factors on the Clinical Features of High-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Study Across Multiple Institutions

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionHigh-grade gliomas (HGG), WHO grade III or IV primary brain malignancies
Key MechanismsTumor classification by IDH genotype affecting origin, progression, and prognosis; aggressive growth causing focal neurological deficits and mass effect
Target PopulationAdults aged 18 and older diagnosed with HGG, diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds including White, Black, and Hispanic patients
Care SettingTertiary academic medical centers in the United States

Key Highlights

  • HGG incidence varies by race and ethnicity, with European Americans having higher rates and older age at diagnosis.
  • Clinical presentation differs by sociodemographic factors: White patients more often present with cognitive deficits; Black and Hispanic patients more frequently present with severe symptoms like syncope and seizures.
  • White patients show less midline shift and mass effect on imaging compared to Black and Hispanic patients, indicating potential differences in tumor progression or detection.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Confirm HGG diagnosis via pathology and WHO grading (III or IV).
  • Determine IDH1 mutation status using immunohistochemical staining to inform prognosis.
  • Consider sociodemographic factors and symptom presentation patterns when evaluating patients.

Management

  • Tailor treatment plans acknowledging differences in clinical presentation and potential disparities in access to care.
  • Monitor for generalized symptoms (headache, nausea, seizures) and focal neurological deficits based on tumor location and growth.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Use Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) to assess functional status across diverse patient populations.
  • Monitor imaging for midline shift and mass effect, especially in Black and Hispanic patients who may present with more severe imaging findings.

Risks

  • Recognize that HGG carries poor prognosis with median survival 12–72 months depending on grade.
  • Be aware of disparities in symptom severity and presentation that may impact timely diagnosis and outcomes.

Patient & Prescribing Data

317 adult patients with pathology-confirmed HGG from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds treated at three US tertiary centers.

Sociodemographic factors influence clinical presentation and may affect treatment timing and outcomes; further research needed to optimize personalized care.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate sociodemographic data including race, ethnicity, and social vulnerability indices into clinical assessment.
  • Recognize and address potential disparities in symptom recognition and healthcare access.
  • Use multidisciplinary approaches to manage neurological symptoms and functional impairments.
  • Apply standardized performance scales like KPS to monitor patient status longitudinally.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content