Feasibility of automated registration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for inguinal hernia surgery : a single-centre pilot study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Automated Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Single-Centre Pilot Study of Feasibility

  • By

  • R. R. Meuzelaar

  • H. V. Smit

  • F. P.J. den Hartog

  • A. H.W. Schiphorst

  • P. J. Tanis

  • J. P.J. Burgmans

  • October 15, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Automated Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Single-Centre Pilot Study of Feasibility

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Automated Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Inguinal Hernia Surgery
Key MechanismsAutomated email invitations prompt patients to complete brief patient-reported outcome measures at predetermined intervals; responses are synchronized with the electronic medical record.
Target PopulationPopulation described in the source article.
Care SettingCare setting described in the source article.

Key Highlights

  • The pilot assessed feasibility of automated PROMs collection without healthcare personnel involvement or added administrative burden.
  • The primary objective was to establish the response rate at each follow-up time point.
  • PROMs covered pain, return to work and exercise, hernia recurrence, and satisfaction with treatment.
  • Questionnaires used concise, fixed, and dynamic questions to limit burden and tailor length to patient responses.
  • The analysis excluded emergency repairs, procedures other than TEP or Lichtenstein repair, and patients who missed a preoperative or postoperative invitation.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

    Management

    • TEP repair was the preferred approach except when contraindications included recurrent hernia after TEP, prior preperitoneal surgery, or inability to undergo general anaesthesia.
    • Patients were instructed to avoid strenuous activity during the first postoperative week and to use paracetamol for pain of any intensity.

    Monitoring & Follow-up

    • The system sent automated email invitations for PROMs at predetermined intervals and synchronized responses with the electronic medical record.
    • The PROMs assessed pain, return to work and exercise, recurrence, and treatment satisfaction.

    Risks

    • The article states that clinical data lack the patient perspective on chronic postoperative inguinal pain and hernia recurrence.
    • Patients treated emergently were excluded because they could not complete the baseline questionnaire before surgery.

    Patient & Prescribing Data

    Adults undergoing elective TEP or Lichtenstein mesh repair; emergency cases and patients without both preoperative and postoperative invitation opportunities were excluded.

    TEP used general anaesthesia and a 10 × 15 cm heavyweight, microporous, nonabsorbable polypropylene mesh. Lichtenstein repair used spinal anaesthesia and a 6 × 11 cm lightweight, macroporous, partially absorbable polypropylene mesh. Discharge was generally on the day of surgery unless adverse events prevented it.

    Clinical Best Practices

    • The study used brief PROMs questionnaires sent at predetermined intervals and synchronized responses with the electronic medical record.
    • The study reports telephone follow-up 6 to 8 weeks after surgery.

    Related Resources & Content

      Original Source(s)

      Related Content