Determinants of survival after re-resection for recurrent glioblastoma: a meta-analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire

Determinants of survival after re-resection for recurrent glioblastoma: a meta-analysis

  • By

  • Manuel V. Baby

  • Rithvik M. Narendranath

  • Symriti Kaur-Paneser

  • Daniele S. C. Ramsay

  • Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah

  • Srikar R. Namireddy

  • Ahmed Salih

  • Ahkash Thavarajasingam

  • Daniel Scurtu

  • Andreas Kramer

  • Veit Stöcklein

  • Darius Kalasauskas

  • Dragan Jankovic

  • Florian Ringel

  • Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam

  • January 13, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Factors Influencing Survival Outcomes Following Re-resection in Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionRecurrent Glioblastoma (Grade 4 glioma, IDH-wildtype)
Key MechanismsTumour progression after initial maximal safe resection and Stupp protocol; impact of re-resection and prognostic factors on survival
Target PopulationPatients with recurrent glioblastoma undergoing re-resection
Care SettingNeuro-oncology surgical and multidisciplinary oncology care

Key Highlights

  • Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumour with poor prognosis despite standard multimodal therapy.
  • Re-resection is performed in 10-30% of recurrent GBM cases but its survival benefit remains controversial.
  • This meta-analysis quantitatively assesses prognostic factors influencing survival after re-resection to guide personalized treatment.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use WHO 2021 classification defining glioblastoma as IDH-wildtype grade 4 glioma.
  • Apply RANO criteria for defining tumour progression including new lesions, increased T2/FLAIR signal, clinical deterioration, and corticosteroid needs.

Management

  • Initial treatment: maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy and concomitant/adjuvant temozolomide (Stupp protocol).
  • For recurrence, consider re-resection in selected patients based on performance status, neurological function, age, and prior treatments.
  • Other options include nitrosoureas, additional temozolomide, bevacizumab, and repeat radiation as per EANO guidelines.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regular imaging and clinical assessment using RANO criteria to detect progression.
  • Monitor corticosteroid requirements and neurological status to assess tumour impact.

Risks

  • Re-resection carries surgical risks and its survival benefit is uncertain; patient selection is critical.
  • Heterogeneity in patient factors and tumour biology influences outcomes.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with recurrent glioblastoma undergoing re-resection, predominantly IDH-wildtype.

Survival benefit of re-resection varies; extent of resection and molecular markers (e.g., MGMT methylation) are important prognostic factors influencing outcomes.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform maximal safe resection at initial diagnosis followed by Stupp protocol.
  • Use RANO criteria for accurate assessment of tumour progression.
  • Select patients for re-resection based on comprehensive evaluation including Karnofsky Performance Status, neurological function, age, and prior treatments.
  • Incorporate molecular classification (IDH status) in prognostic assessment and treatment planning.
  • Apply meta-analytic evidence to personalize treatment strategies for recurrent GBM.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content