Quantifying Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma Progression with a Radiomic Trajectory
-
By
-
Zhen-Bin Qiu
-
Jiaqi Li
-
Shihua Dou
-
Qiuchen Meng
-
Meng-Min Wang
-
Hong-Ji Li
-
Chao Zhang
-
Hongsheng Xie
-
Ben-Yuan Jiang
-
Jun-Tao Lin
-
Jia-Tao Zhang
-
Fang-Ping Xu
-
Jin-Hai Yan
-
Lei Wei
-
Yi-Long Wu
-
Haibo Wang
-
Lin Yang
-
Xuegong Zhang
-
Wen-Zhao Zhong
-
November 17, 2025
-
Clinical Scorecard: Assessing Progression of Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma Using a Radiomic Trajectory Analysis
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
| Condition | Early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (esLUAD) |
| Key Mechanisms | Integration of radiomic and pathological information via deep contrastive learning to quantify tumor progression continuously |
| Target Population | Patients with early-stage non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma |
| Care Setting | Multi-institutional hospital settings with access to CT imaging and pathological analysis |
Key Highlights
- RadioTrace, a deep learning framework, quantifies esLUAD progression beyond conventional pathological grading.
- Pseudo-progression score (PPS) predicts tumor phenotypes such as spread through air spaces (STAS), lymph node metastasis (LNM), and survival outcomes.
- RadioTrace reveals significant survival heterogeneity within the same pathological grade, addressing limitations of current grading systems.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Use CT imaging combined with radiomic analysis to non-invasively assess tumor progression in esLUAD.
- Incorporate continuous radiomic trajectory measures like RadioTrace to complement histopathological grading.
Management
- Consider tumor progression scores from radiomic analysis to guide treatment decisions, especially within the same pathological grade.
- Use radiomic progression assessment to identify patients at higher risk for metastasis and poor prognosis.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Apply longitudinal CT follow-ups with radiomic trajectory analysis to monitor continuous tumor progression over time.
Risks
- Recognize limitations of histopathological grading due to sampling bias and interobserver variability.
- Be aware that conventional stepped grading may overlook intragrade heterogeneity affecting prognosis and treatment response.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients diagnosed with early-stage non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma undergoing CT imaging and pathological evaluation
Radiomic progression scores can stratify patients by risk and may inform personalized treatment strategies beyond traditional pathological grades.
Clinical Best Practices
- Combine radiomic and pathological data using validated frameworks like RadioTrace for comprehensive tumor progression assessment.
- Use continuous progression metrics rather than discrete pathological grades to capture tumor heterogeneity.
- Incorporate radiogenomic correlations to understand molecular underpinnings of tumor progression.
- Utilize non-invasive CT-based radiomic analysis to reduce sampling bias inherent in biopsy-based grading.
- Implement longitudinal imaging and radiomic analysis for dynamic monitoring of tumor evolution.
References