Sex differences in inappropriate imaging requests: insights from the Medical Imaging Decision And Support (MIDAS) study - Scorecard - MDSpire

Sex differences in inappropriate imaging requests: insights from the Medical Imaging Decision And Support (MIDAS) study

  • By

  • Stijntje Willemijn Dijk

  • Claudia Wollny

  • Thomas Kroencke

  • M. G. Myriam Hunink

  • November 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Gender Variations in Unwarranted Imaging Requests: Findings from the Medical Imaging Decision And Support (MIDAS) Research

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionInappropriate diagnostic imaging requests
Key MechanismsSex-based differences in imaging appropriateness influenced by clinical uncertainty, physician biases, guideline adherence, and systemic factors
Target PopulationAdult patients undergoing diagnostic imaging in German academic hospitals
Care SettingHospital-based diagnostic imaging departments using Computerized Physician Order Entry systems

Key Highlights

  • Women and men exhibit differences in the appropriateness of diagnostic imaging requests across multiple modalities and clinical settings.
  • The ESR iGuide decision support system was used to classify imaging requests as appropriate, conditionally appropriate, or inappropriate based on clinical guidelines.
  • Prior studies show mixed international results on sex-based appropriateness rates, highlighting the need for systematic evaluation.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use validated clinical decision support systems like the ESR iGuide to assess imaging appropriateness based on established criteria.
  • Ensure imaging requests align with clinical indications and guideline-based risk-benefit assessments.

Management

  • Address potential unconscious biases and guideline gaps that may contribute to sex-based disparities in imaging utilization.
  • Implement decision support tools to improve appropriateness of imaging requests prior to ordering.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regularly audit imaging requests for appropriateness stratified by patient sex to identify disparities.
  • Exclude non-standard or unmatched indication-exam combinations from appropriateness analyses to maintain data integrity.

Risks

  • Overutilization of imaging leads to unnecessary radiation exposure, increased healthcare costs, and potential delays in diagnosis.
  • Sex-based disparities may result in under- or over-imaging, impacting patient outcomes and resource allocation.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with recorded binary sex (male or female) undergoing imaging requests in German academic hospitals

Baseline imaging requests prior to decision support intervention reveal sex-related differences in appropriateness, underscoring the need for tailored strategies to optimize imaging use.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate structured indication input in computerized order entry systems to facilitate appropriateness scoring.
  • Blind physicians to appropriateness scores during baseline data collection to capture unbiased imaging request patterns.
  • Use highest appropriateness score when multiple indications are selected for a single imaging request.
  • Exclude imaging exams performed outside formal order entry systems (e.g., point-of-care ultrasounds) from appropriateness analyses.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content