A machine learning–enabled blood transcriptomic signature for digital diagnosis and subtyping of Alzheimer’s disease - Scorecard - MDSpire

A machine learning–enabled blood transcriptomic signature for digital diagnosis and subtyping of Alzheimer’s disease

  • By

  • Shuo Ma

  • Dawen Chen

  • Yanzhi Li

  • Yanxia Liu

  • Meiling Zhou

  • Jiwei Wang

  • Yuming Yao

  • Yinhao Chen

  • Guoqiu Wu

  • January 5, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Blood Transcriptomic Profile Utilizing Machine Learning for Digital Diagnosis and Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionAlzheimer’s disease (AD), a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder causing dementia
Key MechanismsAmyloid-β deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, synaptic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and lactylation-related epigenetic and metabolic alterations
Target PopulationElderly individuals including normal controls, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and AD patients
Care SettingClinical and research settings focusing on early detection and patient stratification

Key Highlights

  • Development of a Lactylation-Derived Score (LDS) based on seven key genes for non-invasive AD diagnosis using blood transcriptomics and machine learning
  • LDS correlates with disease severity (Braak stage, MMSE) and improves detection of AD and amyloid-tau positive individuals when combined with plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217
  • Lactylation dysregulation links epigenetic chromatin remodeling and mitochondrial dysfunction, revealing metabolic-immune heterogeneity in AD subtypes

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Utilize blood-based biomarkers including LDS and plasma p-tau181/217 for early and non-invasive AD detection
  • Consider transcriptomic profiling to identify lactylation-related gene expression changes for patient stratification
  • Combine LDS with established plasma biomarkers to enhance diagnostic accuracy for AD and amyloid-tau positivity

Management

  • Incorporate molecular subtype information (lactylation-based clusters) to tailor therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic and immune pathways
  • Monitor cognitive decline using MMSE alongside biomarker profiles to guide clinical decision-making

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Track LDS scores longitudinally to assess disease progression and response to interventions
  • Use plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 levels as complementary markers for monitoring AD pathology

Risks

  • Recognize limitations of invasive CSF biomarkers and high costs restricting large-scale screening
  • Account for heterogeneity in lactylation patterns which may affect biomarker interpretation

Patient & Prescribing Data

Elderly individuals including normal controls, aMCI, and AD patients from multi-cohort transcriptomic and plasma cohorts

LDS provides a mechanistically informed biomarker for early detection and stratification, potentially guiding personalized therapeutic approaches targeting epigenetic and metabolic dysfunction

Clinical Best Practices

  • Apply machine-learning derived LDS in conjunction with plasma p-tau biomarkers for improved AD diagnosis
  • Use non-invasive blood transcriptomic profiling to overcome limitations of CSF biomarker testing
  • Consider lactylation-based molecular subtyping to understand patient heterogeneity and optimize management
  • Integrate cognitive assessments with biomarker data for comprehensive evaluation

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content