Critical feminist epidemiology in action: reflections from a multidisciplinary partnership between Mujeres Unidas y Activas and academic researchers - Scorecard - MDSpire

Critical feminist epidemiology in action: reflections from a multidisciplinary partnership between Mujeres Unidas y Activas and academic researchers

  • By

  • Alison K Cohen

  • Juanita Flores

  • María Jiménez

  • Kathleen M Coll

  • Nathalie López

  • Taina B Quiles

  • Beda Castillo

  • Sajia Darwish

  • Amy Rich

  • Marina Franco

  • August 14, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Engaging Critical Feminist Epidemiology: Insights from a Collaborative Effort Between Mujeres Unidas y Activas and Academic Scholars

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionHealth inequities among women and gender-expansive populations
Key MechanismsCritical feminist epidemiology integrates social and structural determinants of health, community-based participatory research, and feminist research principles to study and address health inequities
Target PopulationWomen and gender-expansive people, particularly minoritized genders including Latina and Indigenous immigrant women
Care SettingCommunity and population health research settings involving academic-community partnerships

Key Highlights

  • Critical feminist epidemiology centers lived experiences of minoritized genders to identify interventions reducing health inequities.
  • It builds upon social epidemiology and community-based participatory research to produce actionable, community-relevant evidence.
  • The approach promotes equitable researcher-participant partnerships and acknowledges the political nature of research.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Incorporate intersectional analysis of social constructs such as gender, race, and discrimination in epidemiologic studies.
  • Use community-engaged methods to identify relevant health determinants and inequities.

Management

  • Apply community-based participatory research principles to co-produce knowledge with affected populations.
  • Develop interventions informed by community-led research to address structural and social determinants of health.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Engage community partners continuously to ensure research relevance and responsiveness to evolving health equity needs.
  • Monitor the impact of interventions on reducing health inequities among minoritized gender populations.

Risks

  • Avoid reinforcing existing inequities by maintaining equitable power dynamics in research partnerships.
  • Be aware of the political implications of research and strive to prevent exacerbation of marginalization.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Latina and Indigenous immigrant women and other gender-expansive minoritized groups

Community-led research approaches enhance relevance and effectiveness of health interventions by centering lived experience and promoting empowerment.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Integrate critical feminist perspectives to address social and structural determinants in epidemiologic research.
  • Foster equitable partnerships between academic researchers and community members throughout the research process.
  • Utilize intersectional frameworks to capture complex experiences of marginalization affecting health.
  • Translate research findings into actionable interventions aimed at health equity.
  • Recognize and address the political dimensions inherent in health research.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content