IDSA updates guidance for antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections
"Determining how best to place and use these agents requires weighing multiple factors and is a constantly evolving science."
By
Meg Barbor
August 21, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: IDSA updates guidance for antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections
At a Glance
Category Detail
Condition Antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections
Key Mechanisms Involves six major pathogen groups: ESBL-E, AmpC-E, CRE, DTR P. aeruginosa, CRAB, and S. maltophilia.
Target Population Adults and children, with specific dosing guidance for adults.
Care Setting U.S. clinical practice
Key Highlights
Guidance incorporates newer therapies and evolving evidence. Susceptibility testing is central to treatment decisions. Empiric treatment should consider infection severity and local resistance patterns. Preferred therapies vary based on resistance mechanisms. Newer agents expand treatment options for difficult-to-treat infections.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Identify the organism causing the infection and its susceptibility.
Management
Use carbapenems for invasive ESBL-E infections outside the urinary tract. Cefepime is preferred for AmpC-E infections when susceptible. Specific treatments recommended for CRE based on resistance mechanism.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Reassess treatment once organism and susceptibility profile are known.
Risks
Avoid unnecessary antibiotic use by distinguishing true infection from colonization.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Adults and children with antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections.
Transition from intravenous to oral therapy when clinically stable and appropriate.
Clinical Best Practices
Consider safety, tolerability, cost, and ease of administration when choosing antibiotics. Use newer beta-lactam agents for DTR P. aeruginosa based on susceptibility testing. Cefiderocol monotherapy is preferred for invasive S. maltophilia infections.
Related Resources & Content