Discovery of a resistant cohort to acute kidney injury: insights from patients with septic shock - Scorecard - MDSpire

Discovery of a resistant cohort to acute kidney injury: insights from patients with septic shock

  • By

  • Dana Y. Fuhrman

  • Towia A. Libermann

  • Neil A. Hukriede

  • Luca Molinari

  • Samir M. Parikh

  • John A. Kellum

  • October 8, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Identification of a Resilient Group Against Acute Kidney Injury: Findings from Septic Shock Patients

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionAcute Kidney Injury (AKI) in septic shock patients
Key MechanismsKidney stress and injury biomarkers including [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] indicating cellular stress and KIM-1 indicating tubular injury
Target PopulationCritically ill adult patients with septic shock
Care SettingEmergency departments and intensive care units

Key Highlights

  • Sepsis-associated AKI occurs in 40–50% of septic patients and increases mortality three to five-fold.
  • [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] and KIM-1 biomarkers enable identification of kidney stress and subclinical injury before clinical AKI develops.
  • A subset of patients with high kidney stress biomarkers but no clinical or biomarker evidence of AKI were identified as AKI-resistant.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use KDIGO criteria combining serum creatinine and urine output to classify AKI.
  • Measure urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] at 6 hours post-resuscitation to assess kidney stress.
  • Use urinary KIM-1 levels to detect subclinical kidney injury not evident by KDIGO criteria.

Management

  • Recognize patients with elevated [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] but no AKI as a distinct AKI-resistant group.
  • Continue standard septic shock resuscitation protocols as per ProCESS trial guidelines.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor serum creatinine and urine output daily for up to 7 days post-enrollment.
  • Repeat biomarker measurements as clinically indicated to assess kidney stress and injury progression.

Risks

  • Patients with elevated kidney stress biomarkers and clinical AKI have increased morbidity and mortality.
  • Failure to identify subclinical injury may delay intervention and worsen outcomes.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with septic shock enrolled in the ProCESS trial excluding those with ESRD or baseline serum creatinine >4 mg/dL

Biomarker-guided identification of AKI resistance may inform prognosis but does not currently alter standard resuscitation treatment.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate biomarker testing ([TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] and KIM-1) alongside clinical criteria to stratify AKI risk in septic shock patients.
  • Use a [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] cutoff >1.0 (ng/mL)2/1000 to indicate significant kidney stress.
  • Use a KIM-1 cutoff ≤2 ng/mL to define absence of subclinical kidney injury.
  • Classify patients as AKI-resistant if they have high kidney stress biomarkers without clinical or biomarker evidence of AKI.
  • Focus on early identification of AKI risk to potentially improve patient-centered outcomes.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content