High-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with ultra-low contrast medium volume for the detection of pulmonary embolism: a comparison with standard CTPA - Scorecard - MDSpire

High-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with ultra-low contrast medium volume for the detection of pulmonary embolism: a comparison with standard CTPA

  • By

  • Tobias Schönfeld

  • Patrick Seitz

  • Christian Krieghoff

  • Slavica Ponorac

  • Alexander Wötzel

  • Stefan Olthoff

  • Sebastian Schaudt

  • Jonas Steglich

  • Matthias Gutberlet

  • Robin F. Gohmann

  • September 1, 2023

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluation of High-Pitch CT Pulmonary Angiography with Minimal Contrast Volume for Pulmonary Embolism Detection: A Comparative Study with Standard Techniques

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionPulmonary Embolism (PE)
Key MechanismsCT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) using high-pitch dual-source CT with ultra-low contrast volume and adapted kVp and tube current
Target PopulationNormal weight patients with suspected PE in emergency care setting
Care SettingEmergency radiology department using dual-source CT scanners

Key Highlights

  • High-pitch CTPA protocol uses pitch 3.2, scan time <1s, and 20 mL contrast volume versus standard pitch 1.2, ~2s scan time, and 50 mL contrast.
  • High-pitch mode reduces motion artifacts and radiation dose while maintaining image quality and diagnostic feasibility.
  • Study included 81 normal weight patients; exclusion criteria included severe nephropathy, iodine contrast hypersensitivity, obesity (BMI ≥35), and pregnancy.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use CTPA as the method of choice for imaging pulmonary vasculature in suspected PE due to high sensitivity (83%) and specificity (96%).
  • Employ bolus tracking with ROI in pulmonary trunk to time scan initiation at 80 HU threshold.

Management

  • Consider high-pitch dual-source CT protocols with ultra-low contrast volume to reduce radiation and contrast risks without compromising image quality.
  • Avoid breath-hold commands in high-pitch CTPA to improve compliance in patients with dyspnea or limited cooperation.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor renal function prior to contrast administration; exclude patients with GFR <30 mL/min to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy.
  • Assess image quality subjectively by experienced radiologists using standardized scoring.

Risks

  • Be aware of radiation exposure risks, including potential neoplasia induction (2% of new cancers linked to CT radiation).
  • Minimize iodinated contrast volume to reduce risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and DNA radiation damage amplification.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Normal weight patients with suspected PE, excluding severe nephropathy, iodine hypersensitivity, obesity, and pregnancy.

High-pitch CTPA with 20 mL contrast and rapid acquisition is feasible and comparable to standard CTPA with 50 mL contrast in image quality and diagnostic performance.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize dual-source CT scanners capable of high-pitch scanning (>3) to avoid acquisition gaps and artifacts.
  • Apply iterative reconstruction algorithms (ADMIRE) with appropriate strength to optimize image quality.
  • Use peripheral venous catheter (≥20 gauge) and automated contrast injector at 4 mL/s injection rate.
  • Tailor scanning protocols to patient compliance, avoiding breath-hold commands when possible to reduce motion artifacts.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content