Long-term outcomes following augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion patients - Scorecard - MDSpire

Long-term outcomes following augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion patients

  • By

  • Sai Chandan Reddy

  • Mahnoor Shafi

  • Alison Park

  • Liam P. Hughes

  • Jawad M. Khalifeh

  • Tej D. Azad

  • Timothy F. Witham

  • December 11, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Long-term results of spinal fusion patients undergoing pedicle screw placement with augmented reality assistance

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionThoracolumbar spinal fusion requiring pedicle screw instrumentation
Key MechanismsAugmented reality overlays intraoperative CT images via head-mounted displays to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy while preserving tactile feedback
Target PopulationAdult patients (>18 years) undergoing thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spinal fusion with pedicle screw placement; excluding cervical spine and revision cases
Care SettingIntraoperative use of AR technology in surgical operating rooms during spinal fusion procedures

Key Highlights

  • AR-assisted pedicle screw placement improves accuracy by real-time tracking of screw position and angle with preserved haptic feedback
  • This study evaluated 59 consecutive patients undergoing AR-assisted spinal fusion with prospective follow-up using ODI and SF-36 patient-reported outcomes
  • Long-term outcomes including surgical revision rates, physical and mental functioning, and postoperative complications were assessed to determine clinical impact of AR assistance

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use preoperative imaging and clinical assessment to identify candidates for thoracolumbar spinal fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation
  • Exclude cervical spine and revision cases when evaluating AR-assisted pedicle screw placement outcomes due to anatomical complexity and confounding factors

Management

  • Employ AR head-mounted displays (e.g., Augmedics XVision) intraoperatively to overlay CT images on surgical field for enhanced pedicle screw placement accuracy
  • Maintain standard surgical protocols for thoracolumbar fusion including monitoring for complications such as durotomy, infection, and instrumentation issues

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Collect perioperative data including blood loss, surgery length, and intraoperative complications
  • Monitor postoperative outcomes including junctional kyphosis, neurological deficits, pseudarthrosis, and need for revision surgery
  • Use validated patient-reported outcome measures (Oswestry Disability Index and SF-36) to assess physical and mental functioning pre- and postoperatively

Risks

  • Potential recall bias in retrospective patient-reported preoperative functional assessments
  • Possible complications include wound infection, hematoma, CSF leak, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and instrumentation misplacement
  • Exclusion of cervical and revision cases due to increased anatomical complexity and confounding variables

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults undergoing first-time thoracolumbar spinal fusion with AR-assisted pedicle screw placement

AR assistance is feasible and safe during early adoption, with potential to improve surgical accuracy and patient-reported physical and mental outcomes compared to traditional navigation methods

Clinical Best Practices

  • Standardize surgical technique, equipment, and workflow during AR-assisted pedicle screw placement to ensure consistency
  • Utilize intraoperative AR visualization to reduce line-of-sight interruptions and attention shifts associated with external monitors
  • Incorporate prospective patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate long-term functional benefits of AR-assisted spinal fusion
  • Exclude complex cases such as cervical spine fusions and revisions when assessing AR technology efficacy to reduce confounding factors

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content