Assessing the association of physical distancing to avoid COVID-19 with health-related quality of life in immunocompromised adolescents: results from the cross-sectional observational EAGLE study - Scorecard - MDSpire

Assessing the association of physical distancing to avoid COVID-19 with health-related quality of life in immunocompromised adolescents: results from the cross-sectional observational EAGLE study

  • By

  • Paul Williams

  • Timothy A. Herring

  • Renata T. C. Yokota

  • Sudhir Venkatesan

  • Klas Bergenheim

  • Johan L. Severens

  • Philip A. Powell

  • James C. Marcus

  • Stephanie Philpott

  • Sara Bestea

  • Jeffrey M. Rohay

  • Tiago Maia

  • Sylvia Taylor

  • Marieke Krol

  • James W. Varni

  • May 28, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating the Link Between Physical Distancing Practices to Mitigate COVID-19 and Health-Related Quality of Life in Immunocompromised Adolescents: Findings from the EAGLE Cross-Sectional Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionCOVID-19 impact on health-related quality of life
Key MechanismsPhysical distancing behaviors to avoid COVID-19
Target PopulationImmunocompromised adolescents aged 13–17 years
Care SettingPost-lockdown period in the United States and United Kingdom

Key Highlights

  • 405 immunocompromised adolescents participated in the study.
  • Mean PDS-C19 T-score was 49.1, indicating moderate physical distancing intensity.
  • 60.1% reported moderate and 16.3% reported high/very high physical distancing intensity.
  • Mean PedsQL™ score was 58.0, indicating moderate HRQoL.
  • Higher physical distancing intensity correlated with worse HRQoL and greater school impairment.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess physical distancing behaviors using the PDS-C19 scale.

Management

  • Encourage immunocompromised adolescents to practice risk-reducing behaviors.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor HRQoL and mental health outcomes in relation to physical distancing.

Risks

  • Increased school and activity impairment associated with higher physical distancing.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Immunocompromised adolescents aged 13–17 years

Physical distancing behaviors may negatively impact HRQoL.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement supportive measures to address mental health in immunocompromised adolescents.
  • Encourage balanced approaches to physical distancing that consider HRQoL.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content