The first patient-reported outcomes from the Utrecht Prostate Cohort (UPC): the first platform facilitating ‘trials within cohorts’ (TwiCs) for the evaluation of interventions for prostate cancer - Scorecard - MDSpire

The first patient-reported outcomes from the Utrecht Prostate Cohort (UPC): the first platform facilitating ‘trials within cohorts’ (TwiCs) for the evaluation of interventions for prostate cancer

  • By

  • Frederik R. Teunissen

  • Thomas Willigenburg

  • Richard P. Meijer

  • Harm H. E. van Melick

  • Helena M. Verkooijen

  • Jochem R. N. van der Voort van Zyp

  • July 21, 2022

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Initial Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Utrecht Prostate Cohort (UPC): A Novel Platform for Conducting 'Trials within Cohorts' (TwiCs) to Assess Prostate Cancer Interventions

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionNon-metastatic, histologically proven prostate cancer
Key MechanismsUse of Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design to evaluate multiple prostate cancer interventions simultaneously within a prospective observational cohort
Target PopulationMen diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer eligible for standard or experimental treatments
Care SettingUrology clinics and radiotherapy facilities within the Netherlands

Key Highlights

  • UPC cohort enables real-life data infrastructure for short- and long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes in prostate cancer treatment.
  • TwiCs design allows randomized evaluation of multiple experimental interventions compared to standard care within the same cohort.
  • Staged-informed consent permits broad consent for future random allocation to experimental treatments, improving trial participation and reducing bias.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Histological confirmation of prostate cancer is required for inclusion.
  • Comprehensive staging including PSA level, TNM classification, imaging (PI-RADS, PSMA-PET CT, bone scintigraphy) is recommended.

Management

  • Standard curative treatments include EBRT, brachytherapy, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
  • Active surveillance is an option for selected low- and intermediate-risk patients.
  • Experimental treatments such as MR-guided radiotherapy, HIFU, and irreversible electroporation are under evaluation within the cohort.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regular PSA measurements to assess recurrence and progression-free survival.
  • Use of validated patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and multiple follow-up time points (1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months).
  • Assessment of acute and chronic toxicity using CTCAE v5 and surgical complications via Clavien Dindo classification.

Risks

  • Radical treatments carry risks of genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events and erectile dysfunction.
  • Potential for patient disappointment or dropout in randomized trials due to allocation to control arm mitigated by TwiCs design.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Men with non-metastatic prostate cancer enrolled in the UPC cohort across multiple Dutch centers.

Real-world data collection facilitates evaluation of treatment effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported quality of life outcomes across standard and experimental interventions.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement staged-informed consent to enable efficient enrollment and randomization within the TwiCs design.
  • Collect comprehensive clinical, pathological, imaging, and patient-reported data prospectively to support robust outcome assessment.
  • Use a cloud-based database and standardized toxicity and complication grading systems to ensure data quality and comparability.
  • Inform all patients about study results after completion regardless of individual participation in specific interventions.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content