Assessing the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Educating Pediatric Patients: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Analysis
By
Ellaha Haidar
Alice Ruan
September 25, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Assessing the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Educating Pediatric Patients: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Analysis
At a Glance
Category Detail
Condition Pediatric Ophthalmological Conditions Key Mechanisms Comparison of AI-generated health information with NHS leaflets Target Population Parents of pediatric patients with ophthalmological conditions Care Setting Patient education resources
Key Highlights
AI-generated materials required a higher reading level than NHS leaflets. NHS materials scored higher in readability and information quality. AI platforms did not cite sources, compromising evidence-based practice. Timeliness of AI-generated content was noted as an advantage. Human oversight is necessary for fact-checking AI-generated information. Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Management
Monitoring & Follow-up
Risks
AI-generated content may include inaccuracies or 'hallucinations'. Lack of visual aids in AI materials may hinder understanding. Patient & Prescribing Data
Pediatric patients and their caregivers seeking health information
AI tools can provide timely information but require human oversight.
Clinical Best Practices
Use trusted professional leaflets as the standard for patient education. Incorporate human oversight in the use of AI-generated materials. Future AI systems should allow adjustable readability levels. Related Resources & Content
