Temperature assessment study of ex vivo holmium laser enucleation of the prostate model - Scorecard - MDSpire

Temperature assessment study of ex vivo holmium laser enucleation of the prostate model

  • By

  • Mehmet Yilmaz

  • Cäcilia Elisabeth Maria Heuring

  • Franz Friedrich Dressler

  • Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola

  • Christian Gratzke

  • Arkadiusz Miernik

  • Simon Hein

  • May 25, 2022

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluation of Temperature Changes in an Ex Vivo Model of Holmium Laser Enucleation for Prostate Surgery

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBenign prostatic hyperplasia requiring prostate surgery
Key MechanismsHolmium:YAG laser with 2140 nm wavelength causing low tissue penetration and heat generation; irrigation flow simulating blood convection
Target PopulationPatients undergoing minimally invasive prostate surgery (HoLEP)
Care SettingUrology surgical centers performing HoLEP

Key Highlights

  • HoLEP is a minimally invasive alternative to TURP and open prostatectomy with superior outcomes and fewer complications.
  • Holmium:YAG laser energy is absorbed by water in prostate tissue, producing low penetration depth (~0.4 mm) and localized heat.
  • Ex vivo experiments measured temperature changes during HoLEP under varying irrigation flow rates and cavity volumes to assess heat generation.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use standard clinical and imaging assessments to determine prostate size and suitability for HoLEP.

Management

  • Perform HoLEP using Ho:YAG laser at 80 W power with continuous irrigation to minimize thermal injury.
  • Maintain irrigation flow rates around 400 ml/min to simulate physiological convection and reduce heat accumulation.
  • Use monopolar coagulation with sprayCOAG® settings for vessel haemostasis post-enucleation.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor temperature changes during laser application to prevent excessive heat buildup (>60 °C) in prostate tissue.
  • Utilize temperature probes or thermal imaging in experimental or training settings to assess thermal effects.

Risks

  • Potential thermal injury to surrounding tissue if irrigation flow is insufficient or laser energy is excessive.
  • Necrosis depth varies with coagulation power settings; careful control needed to avoid excessive tissue damage.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients undergoing HoLEP for prostate enlargement

Laser parameters and irrigation flow rates should be optimized to balance effective tissue enucleation with minimal thermal damage.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use continuous irrigation at approximately 400 ml/min during HoLEP to simulate physiological blood flow and dissipate heat.
  • Apply Ho:YAG laser at standardized settings (80 W, 4 J pulse energy, 400 µs pulse duration) for consistent outcomes.
  • Employ monopolar coagulation with appropriate power settings for effective haemostasis while minimizing necrosis depth.
  • Consider ex vivo or simulation models for training and evaluation of thermal effects during HoLEP.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content