Imaging for molecular and pathological subtyping of hepatocellular carcinoma—a critical appraisal and future directions - Scorecard - MDSpire

Imaging for molecular and pathological subtyping of hepatocellular carcinoma—a critical appraisal and future directions

  • By

  • Xinyuan Jia

  • Hanyu Jiang

  • Zheng Ye

  • Hong Wei

  • Jie Chen

  • Yali Qu

  • Claude B. Sirlin

  • Bin Song

  • Yanshu Wang

  • October 30, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating Imaging Techniques for Molecular and Pathological Classification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review and Future Perspectives

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a biologically heterogeneous liver malignancy
Key MechanismsMolecular heterogeneity (proliferative vs non-proliferative classes) and pathological heterogeneity influencing prognosis and treatment response
Target PopulationPatients with HCC, including those with chronic HBV, HCV, ALD, MASH, and other liver disease etiologies
Care SettingClinical oncology and hepatology settings involving imaging and therapeutic decision-making

Key Highlights

  • HCC is classified molecularly into proliferative (approx. 50%) and non-proliferative classes with distinct molecular drivers and clinical outcomes.
  • Pathological subtypes include conventional HCC and eight distinct variants, with some correlating to molecular classes (e.g., MTM and progenitor with proliferative).
  • Noninvasive imaging (multiphase CT and multiparametric MRI) shows promise in inferring molecular and pathological HCC subtypes to guide prognosis and treatment.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use multiphase CT and multiparametric MRI to assess imaging features correlating with molecular and pathological HCC subtypes.
  • Recognize that invasive tissue sampling remains the gold standard but is limited by availability and sampling error.
  • Consider molecular classification (proliferative vs non-proliferative) to understand tumor biology and prognosis.

Management

  • Tailor therapeutic decisions based on molecular and pathological subtype information when available.
  • Account for proliferative class association with aggressive behavior and poorer outcomes, especially in chronic HBV patients.
  • Recognize non-proliferative class tumors often have better prognosis and are associated with ALD, MASH, and HCV etiologies.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor serum biomarkers such as AFP and DCP, which tend to be higher in proliferative HCC.
  • Use imaging follow-up to detect features suggestive of subtype changes or progression.

Risks

  • Sampling errors and invasiveness limit tissue-based classification accuracy.
  • Molecular heterogeneity within tumors may complicate classification and treatment response prediction.
  • CTNNB1 mutations linked to immune exclusion may confer resistance to immunotherapy.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients diagnosed with HCC across various etiologies including HBV, HCV, ALD, and MASH

Molecular subtype influences prognosis and therapeutic responsiveness; proliferative tumors may require more aggressive treatment and have poorer outcomes, while non-proliferative tumors may respond differently, highlighting the need for individualized management.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Integrate multiphase CT and multiparametric MRI imaging features with clinical and serum biomarker data to noninvasively infer HCC molecular and pathological subtypes.
  • Consider molecular and pathological classification to inform prognosis and guide personalized treatment strategies.
  • Recognize limitations of current classifications and the need for further research on tumor heterogeneity and imaging correlations.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content