Computer vision applications in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal - Scorecard - MDSpire

Computer vision applications in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal

  • By

  • Annudesh Liyanage

  • Ben Li

  • Jason Yi

  • Muhammad Mamdani

  • Konrad Salata

  • February 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Systematic Review and Evaluation of Computer Vision Technologies in Vascular Surgery

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionVascular diseases including aortic pathologies, carotid stenosis, foot ulcers, and peripheral artery disease
Key MechanismsApplication of computer vision techniques for image analysis, segmentation, and classification in vascular surgery
Target PopulationPatients with vascular diseases such as aortic aneurysms, carotid artery stenosis, diabetic foot ulcers, and peripheral artery disease
Care SettingVascular surgery clinical and research settings utilizing imaging data

Key Highlights

  • 288 studies reviewed with rapid growth in computer vision applications since 2017
  • Major focus on aortic pathologies (33%), carotid stenosis (30%), and foot ulcers (25%), with limited research on peripheral artery disease (6%)
  • Commonly reported performance metrics were Dice coefficient (51%) and accuracy (36%), with infrequent use of AUROC (17%)

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use Dice coefficient for evaluating segmentation tasks
  • Use AUROC for discrimination tasks in diagnostic models

Management

  • Incorporate computer vision tools to support clinical decision-making in vascular surgery
  • Focus development on underrepresented conditions such as peripheral artery disease

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Adhere to TRIPOD+AI guidelines early during model development to improve transparency and reduce bias

Risks

  • High risk of bias in majority of studies (85%) necessitates cautious interpretation
  • Poor adherence (57%) to reporting standards may limit reproducibility and clinical translation

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with vascular diseases undergoing imaging evaluation

Computer vision models can assist in accurate image segmentation and classification to inform treatment planning, but require rigorous validation and standardized reporting

Clinical Best Practices

  • Consult TRIPOD+AI statement during early stages of model development
  • Prioritize use of standardized performance metrics such as Dice coefficient and AUROC depending on task
  • Expand research focus to include peripheral artery disease to address current gaps
  • Ensure prospective data collection and clinical trials to validate computer vision applications
  • Maintain critical appraisal of bias risk and methodological quality in studies

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content