Enhancing the Care of Patients With Bone and Joint Infections Through Educational Interventions - Scorecard - MDSpire

Enhancing the Care of Patients With Bone and Joint Infections Through Educational Interventions

  • By

  • Neel B Shah

  • Jessica Seidelman

  • Katherine Belden

  • Elizabeth Thottacherry

  • Allison Lastinger

  • Priya Nori

  • Ronald M Beaulieu

  • Don Bambino Geno Tai

  • September 2, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Improving Management of Bone and Joint Infections via Educational Initiatives

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBone and joint infections including periprosthetic joint infection, diabetic foot infections, vertebral osteomyelitis, spinal implant infections, and other musculoskeletal infections
Key MechanismsComplex interplay of microbiology, musculoskeletal anatomy, biofilm formation, surgical intervention, and orthopedic hardware involvement
Target PopulationInfectious diseases clinicians managing musculoskeletal infections, orthopedic patients with implants or comorbidities such as diabetes and immunosuppression
Care SettingInfectious diseases specialty practice, orthopedic surgery, hospital inpatient and outpatient settings

Key Highlights

  • Rising incidence of bone and joint infections driven by aging population, increased orthopedic procedures, comorbidities, and antibiotic resistance
  • High morbidity, mortality, and financial costs associated with infections such as periprosthetic joint infections and diabetic foot infections
  • Educational gaps exist in infectious diseases training regarding musculoskeletal infections, necessitating specialized resources and multidisciplinary management

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Utilize multidisciplinary expertise including infectious diseases and orthopedic specialists for accurate diagnosis
  • Prioritize high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and large observational studies for clinical decision-making

Management

  • Adopt multidisciplinary management approaches involving MSK-ID-trained physicians and orthopedic surgeons
  • Consider surgical intervention and tailored antimicrobial therapy based on infection type and implant involvement
  • Recognize the limited success of some treatments such as debridement and implant retention in spinal implant infections

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Ongoing evaluation of treatment success and complications, especially in high-risk infections like diabetic foot infections and periprosthetic joint infections
  • Utilize educational tools and updated literature to inform monitoring strategies

Risks

  • High 5-year mortality rates associated with periprosthetic joint infections and diabetic foot infections requiring amputation
  • Financial burden exceeding $100,000 per patient for orthopedic surgical site infections
  • Challenges posed by antibiotic-resistant organisms and biofilm-associated infections

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with musculoskeletal infections including those with orthopedic implants, diabetes-related foot infections, and spinal implant infections

Treatment success varies; for example, spinal implant infections have a 71%-73% success rate with debridement and implant retention; suppressive antibiotic therapy role remains unclear

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement specialized educational initiatives such as online libraries and podcasts to improve clinician preparedness
  • Prioritize high-level evidence and contemporary research (post-2013) for clinical guidance
  • Encourage multidisciplinary collaboration between infectious diseases specialists and orthopedic surgeons
  • Utilize curated, peer-reviewed literature repositories to navigate conflicting and variable-quality studies
  • Incorporate user feedback mechanisms to continuously update educational resources

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content