Psychometric validation of the polish version of the Utrecht gender dysphoria scale - gender spectrum questionnaire - Scorecard - MDSpire

Psychometric validation of the polish version of the Utrecht gender dysphoria scale - gender spectrum questionnaire

  • By

  • Agata Tokarek

  • Aleksandra Koczut

  • Agata Gasiorowska

  • April 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Validation of the Polish Adaptation of the Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum Questionnaire

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionGender Dysphoria and Gender Incongruence
Key MechanismsAssessment of distress related to gender incongruence across the gender spectrum using a gender-neutral, psychometrically validated scale
Target PopulationPolish-speaking adults including binary transgender, nonbinary, and cisgender individuals
Care SettingMental health and gender-affirming care settings within Polish healthcare

Key Highlights

  • The Polish UGDS-GS adaptation identified a three-factor structure: Gender dysphoria, Puberty-related distress, and Gender affirmation.
  • The scale demonstrated good internal consistency, measurement stability, and excellent screening accuracy for the Gender dysphoria subscale (AUC = .97).
  • The UGDS-GS-PL provides a gender-neutral alternative to binary-focused assessment tools, improving inclusivity for nonbinary individuals.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use the UGDS-GS-PL to assess gender dysphoria across the full gender spectrum in Polish-speaking adults.
  • Consider the three-factor structure (Gender dysphoria, Puberty-related distress, Gender affirmation) for comprehensive evaluation.

Management

  • Incorporate UGDS-GS-PL screening results to guide timely access to Gender Affirming Care (GAC).
  • Address distress related to gender incongruence identified by the scale to reduce mental health burden.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Utilize the scale’s demonstrated test-retest reliability to monitor symptom stability over time.
  • Regularly reassess gender dysphoria and related distress to inform ongoing care.

Risks

  • Be aware that delayed recognition of gender dysphoria can prolong patient distress and delay access to care.
  • Recognize limitations of binary-focused tools and potential exclusion of nonbinary individuals.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Polish-speaking adults across the gender spectrum including binary transgender, nonbinary, and cisgender individuals

The UGDS-GS-PL facilitates early identification of gender dysphoria and related distress, supporting timely and inclusive gender-affirming interventions.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Adopt gender-neutral language in assessment tools to improve inclusivity and accuracy.
  • Use psychometrically validated instruments like UGDS-GS-PL for reliable measurement of gender dysphoria.
  • Incorporate multi-dimensional assessment including distress related to puberty and gender affirmation experiences.
  • Ensure accessibility of assessment tools for diverse gender identities within clinical practice.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content