Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: a narrative review - Scorecard - MDSpire

Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: a narrative review

  • By

  • Valentina Bianchi

  • Mauro Giambusso

  • Alessandra De Iacob

  • Maria Michela Chiarello

  • Giuseppe Brisinda

  • March 12, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing and Managing Acute Appendicitis: A Comprehensive Review

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionAcute appendicitis
Key MechanismsArtificial intelligence (AI) techniques including machine learning (ML) models such as random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and deep learning (DL) applied to clinical, biochemical, and imaging data for diagnosis and differentiation of appendicitis severity
Target PopulationPatients presenting with suspected acute appendicitis across all ages
Care SettingEmergency departments and surgical settings

Key Highlights

  • AI, particularly machine learning models like random forest, shows high accuracy in diagnosing acute appendicitis and differentiating complicated from uncomplicated cases.
  • Diagnosis of appendicitis requires integration of clinical assessment, biochemical markers, and imaging, with AI potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
  • Current AI applications in appendicitis diagnosis are emerging with promising results but limited by retrospective studies and small case series.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use clinical scores (Alvarado score, appendicitis inflammatory response, adult appendicitis score) alongside biochemical markers (leukocytosis, C-reactive protein) to suspect appendicitis.
  • Perform abdominal ultrasound by experienced operators as first-line imaging; consider low-dose CT scan in doubtful cases.
  • Integrate AI tools trained on demographics, clinical symptoms, biomarkers, and imaging to support diagnosis and severity assessment.

Management

  • Base treatment decisions on comprehensive clinical evaluation supported by imaging and laboratory data.
  • Consider AI-assisted risk stratification to guide urgency and type of surgical intervention.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor clinical progression and laboratory markers to detect complications.
  • Use AI models to potentially predict complicated appendicitis and guide monitoring intensity.

Risks

  • AI diagnostic tools are limited by retrospective data and small sample sizes; clinical judgment remains paramount.
  • Overreliance on AI without adequate validation may lead to misdiagnosis or delayed treatment.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients suspected of acute appendicitis presenting in emergency settings

AI models, especially random forest algorithms, trained on combined demographic, clinical, and laboratory data can improve diagnostic accuracy and help differentiate complicated cases, potentially guiding tailored treatment approaches.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Combine clinical scoring systems with biochemical and imaging data for initial appendicitis assessment.
  • Utilize AI tools as adjuncts to enhance diagnostic accuracy but not as standalone decision-makers.
  • Ensure imaging is performed by experienced operators to maximize diagnostic yield.
  • Interpret AI outputs within the clinical context, considering patient-specific factors such as age, gender, and comorbidities.
  • Support further prospective studies to validate AI applications in appendicitis diagnosis and management.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content