Regret concerning treatment decisions in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors – a cross-sectional exploratory bicentric analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire

Regret concerning treatment decisions in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors – a cross-sectional exploratory bicentric analysis

  • By

  • Julia Reuter

  • Tim Werfel

  • Alexander Rühle

  • Georg Wurschi

  • Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf

  • Johannes Wach

  • Klaus Pietschmann

  • Tomas Kazda

  • Maximilian Römer

  • Nils H. Nicolay

  • Andreas Hinz

  • Clemens Seidel

  • March 25, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Patient Regret Regarding Treatment Choices in Primary and Secondary Brain Tumors: A Bicentric Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionPrimary brain tumors (high- and low-grade gliomas) and brain metastases
Key MechanismsDecision regret (DR) influenced by treatment toxicities, disease progression, psychological distress, and involvement in decision-making
Target PopulationPatients undergoing radiotherapy for brain tumors, including those receiving systemic treatment and surgery
Care SettingRadiation oncology departments in university medical centers

Key Highlights

  • Decision regret (DR) is defined as dissatisfaction or distress with past healthcare decisions and has not been previously analyzed in brain tumor patients.
  • DR may negatively impact emotional, social, and physical well-being and is associated with anxiety, stress, and lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
  • Shared decision making (SDM) is critical to reduce DR by ensuring adequate patient information and alignment of patient preferences with treatment decisions.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess decision regret using the validated 5-item Decision Regret Scale (DRS) separately for radiotherapy, systemic treatment, and surgery decisions.
  • Evaluate health-related quality of life with EORTC QLQ-C30 and brain tumor-specific symptom burden with EORTC BN20.
  • Screen for psychological distress using the NCCN distress thermometer, anxiety with GAD-7, and depression with PHQ-9.

Management

  • Implement shared decision making (SDM) to align treatment decisions with patient preferences and reduce decision regret.
  • Provide adequate information and support to patients before treatment initiation to minimize future regret and psychological distress.
  • Consider the impact of treatment side effects and disease progression on patient well-being when discussing treatment options.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regularly monitor patient-reported decision regret post-treatment to identify those needing additional psychological or social support.
  • Assess ongoing HRQoL, distress, anxiety, and depression to guide supportive care interventions.
  • Use follow-up assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of SDM and patient satisfaction with care.

Risks

  • High decision regret may lead to increased anxiety, stress, and reduced quality of life.
  • Inadequate involvement in decision-making or insufficient information provision can increase risk of decision regret.
  • Intensive treatments with significant side effects, especially in palliative settings, may predispose patients to regret.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with primary brain tumors and brain metastases undergoing radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or surgery

Decision regret was assessed separately for each treatment modality; overall regret scores were calculated when multiple treatments were involved, highlighting the importance of individualized patient support.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use validated tools (DRS, EORTC QLQ-C30, BN20, NCCN distress thermometer, GAD-7, PHQ-9) for comprehensive assessment of patient well-being and decision regret.
  • Engage patients in shared decision making to ensure treatment choices reflect their preferences and values.
  • Provide clear, timely, and comprehensive information about treatment options, risks, and expected outcomes.
  • Identify patients with high decision regret early to offer targeted psychosocial interventions.
  • Consider the cumulative burden of multimodal treatments on patient quality of life when planning therapy.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content