Clinical Scorecard: Patient Regret Regarding Treatment Choices in Primary and Secondary Brain Tumors: A Bicentric Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Primary brain tumors (high- and low-grade gliomas) and brain metastases
Key Mechanisms
Decision regret (DR) influenced by treatment toxicities, disease progression, psychological distress, and involvement in decision-making
Target Population
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for brain tumors, including those receiving systemic treatment and surgery
Care Setting
Radiation oncology departments in university medical centers
Key Highlights
Decision regret (DR) is defined as dissatisfaction or distress with past healthcare decisions and has not been previously analyzed in brain tumor patients.
DR may negatively impact emotional, social, and physical well-being and is associated with anxiety, stress, and lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Shared decision making (SDM) is critical to reduce DR by ensuring adequate patient information and alignment of patient preferences with treatment decisions.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Assess decision regret using the validated 5-item Decision Regret Scale (DRS) separately for radiotherapy, systemic treatment, and surgery decisions.
Evaluate health-related quality of life with EORTC QLQ-C30 and brain tumor-specific symptom burden with EORTC BN20.
Screen for psychological distress using the NCCN distress thermometer, anxiety with GAD-7, and depression with PHQ-9.
Management
Implement shared decision making (SDM) to align treatment decisions with patient preferences and reduce decision regret.
Provide adequate information and support to patients before treatment initiation to minimize future regret and psychological distress.
Consider the impact of treatment side effects and disease progression on patient well-being when discussing treatment options.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Regularly monitor patient-reported decision regret post-treatment to identify those needing additional psychological or social support.
Assess ongoing HRQoL, distress, anxiety, and depression to guide supportive care interventions.
Use follow-up assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of SDM and patient satisfaction with care.
Risks
High decision regret may lead to increased anxiety, stress, and reduced quality of life.
Inadequate involvement in decision-making or insufficient information provision can increase risk of decision regret.
Intensive treatments with significant side effects, especially in palliative settings, may predispose patients to regret.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients with primary brain tumors and brain metastases undergoing radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or surgery
Decision regret was assessed separately for each treatment modality; overall regret scores were calculated when multiple treatments were involved, highlighting the importance of individualized patient support.
Clinical Best Practices
Use validated tools (DRS, EORTC QLQ-C30, BN20, NCCN distress thermometer, GAD-7, PHQ-9) for comprehensive assessment of patient well-being and decision regret.
Engage patients in shared decision making to ensure treatment choices reflect their preferences and values.
Provide clear, timely, and comprehensive information about treatment options, risks, and expected outcomes.
Identify patients with high decision regret early to offer targeted psychosocial interventions.
Consider the cumulative burden of multimodal treatments on patient quality of life when planning therapy.
by Julia Reuter, Tim Werfel, Alexander Rühle, Georg Wurschi, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Johannes Wach, Klaus Pietschmann, Tomas Kazda, Maximilian Römer, Nils H. Nicolay, Andreas Hinz, Clemens Seidel
This twice-monthly newsletter highlights recently published research where Dana-Farber faculty are listed as first or senior authors. The information is pulled from PubMed and this issue notes papers published from March 16 - 31.