Improving survival and narrowing age disparities in mantle cell lymphoma across therapeutic eras - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Survival Gains and Reduced Age-Related Disparities in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Over Successive Treatment Eras

  • By

  • Malak Munir

  • John L. Vaughn

  • Sravani Rimmalapudi

  • Narendranath Epperla

  • October 13, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Survival Gains Across Treatment Eras in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Age-Stratified Outcomes

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype.
Key MechanismsTreatment eras were defined by calendar period and characterized by rituximab integration; intensified immunochemotherapy, including bendamustine-rituximab, and ASCT consolidation; first-generation BTK inhibitor use; and expanded targeted therapy and CAR-T. Individual treatment exposure was not reported.
Target PopulationAdults aged 18 years or older with a first primary, pathologically confirmed MCL diagnosis in the SEER-17 database from 2000 through 2023.
Care SettingPopulation-based US cancer registry analysis of MCL-specific mortality, relative survival, overall survival, and competing causes of death across treatment eras and age groups.

Key Highlights

  • Among 12,785 patients, 3-year MCL-specific mortality declined from 34.2% in 2000–2006 to 22.8% in 2020–2023.
  • Three-year relative survival increased from 63.8% in era 1 to 73.6% in era 4.
  • MCL-specific mortality declined across all four age categories; among patients aged 85 years or older, 3-year cumulative incidence declined from 60.6% in era 1 to 52.1% in era 4.
  • The age-by-era interaction was significant (P = 0.009), indicating that the association between era and outcome varied by age group.
  • Three-year cumulative incidence of death from other causes rose from 7.5% in era 1 to 8.9% in era 4.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Study eligibility required adults with a first primary, pathologically confirmed MCL diagnosis (ICD-O-3 code 9673/3); primary CNS involvement and unavailable survival data were excluded.

Management

  • The study grouped patients by calendar-era treatment context and did not report individual treatment exposure or provide treatment recommendations.
  • The authors note that ASCT was used for selected patients and that randomized studies have questioned its continued necessity in selected patients.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The study assessed relative survival, MCL-specific survival, overall survival, and competing risks of MCL-specific and other-cause death.
  • Age-stratified analyses used categories of 65 years or younger, 66–74, 75–84, and 85 years or older.

Risks

  • Across eras, MCL-specific mortality was higher among patients older than 65 years than among those 65 years or younger (3-year CIF 35.4% vs 19.7%).
  • Patients aged 85 years or older had the highest MCL-specific mortality; their 3-year cumulative incidence declined from 60.6% in era 1 to 52.1% in era 4.
  • The 3-year cumulative incidence of death from other causes increased from 7.5% in era 1 to 8.9% in era 4.

Patient & Prescribing Data

The cohort included 12,785 adults with MCL; mean age at diagnosis was 67.2 years, 71.1% were male, and 56.0% were older than 65 years.

The registry analysis grouped patients by calendar-era treatment context and did not report individual prescriptions or treatment exposure. Era 4 (2020–2023) encompassed expanded targeted therapy and CAR-T, including zanubrutinib and brexucabtagene autoleucel.

Clinical Best Practices

  • The study compared outcomes by diagnosis era, not by individual treatment received.
  • The analysis estimated MCL-specific and other-cause mortality using competing-risks methods.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content