Clinical Scorecard: Psychological Distress in Patients with Low-Grade Gliomas - A Single-Center Investigation (Erratum)
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Low-grade gliomas (LGG)
Key Mechanisms
Psychological distress measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), influenced by pre-existing psychiatric disorders and psychotropic medication intake
Target Population
Patients diagnosed with low-grade gliomas
Care Setting
Inpatient and outpatient screening settings
Key Highlights
Increased psychological distress observed in 22.1% of LGG patients screened by HADS.
Significant risk factors for distress include pre-existing psychiatric disorders and lack of psychotropic medication intake.
Depression and anxiety increased in 17.4% of patients, independent of time since diagnosis or care setting.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to screen for psychological distress in LGG patients.
Consider combined HADS-T scores (≥11 on HADS-D and/or HADS-A) to identify increased distress.
Management
Address pre-existing psychiatric disorders and evaluate psychotropic medication history in LGG patients.
Monitor patients with children and female patients closely for anxiety symptoms.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Screen patients at various time points post-diagnosis (up to 6 months, 6 months to 3 years, and beyond 3 years).
Use Distress Thermometer (DT) alongside HADS for sensitivity and specificity assessment.
Risks
Higher distress risk in patients with pre-existing psychiatric disorders.
Increased distress associated with lack of psychotropic medication intake.
Patient & Prescribing Data
LGG patients with and without prior psychiatric history
Patients lacking history of antidepressant or psychotropic drug intake showed significantly higher distress scores.
Clinical Best Practices
Incorporate routine psychooncological distress screening using validated tools like HADS in LGG patient care.
Identify and manage psychiatric comorbidities early to mitigate distress.
Consider demographic factors such as gender and parental status when assessing anxiety risk.