New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers
Clinical Scorecard: Exploring Advances in Gynecological Surgery: Initial Insights from the HUGO™ Robotic Surgery System at Two Tertiary Referral Centers
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Benign and malignant gynecological conditions including endometrial hyperplasia, leiomyomas, benign ovarian tumors, endometriosis, pelvic organ prolapse, and endometrial cancer
Key Mechanisms
Robotic-assisted surgery using the HUGO™ RAS system providing 3D visualization, precision, and enhanced freedom of movement with a 4-arm configuration
Target Population
Women undergoing gynecological surgery at tertiary referral centers
Care Setting
Tertiary referral hospitals with multiplatform robotic surgery capabilities
Key Highlights
The HUGO™ RAS system was adopted in 2021 and used for 32 gynecological procedures between March 2022 and April 2023.
Procedures included hysterectomy (62.5%), adnexal surgery (21.9%), and pelvic floor surgery ± supracervical hysterectomy (15.6%).
Median docking time was 8 minutes, console time varied by procedure type, and no major system failures or conversions were reported.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Patient selection based on gynecological indication including benign and malignant conditions.
Preoperative assessment including age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and surgical history.
Management
Use of HUGO™ RAS system with a 4-arm setup and specific port placements as per Medtronic guidelines.
Dedicated surgeon training including e-learning and wet lab practice prior to clinical use.
Patient positioning in Lloyd Davies 20° Trendelenburg with uterine manipulators tailored to procedure type.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Recording docking, console, and skin-to-skin times for operative efficiency assessment.
Monitoring perioperative complications using Clavien–Dindo classification.
Tracking instrument clashing, technical errors, system failures, estimated blood loss, catheter removal day, and length of stay.
Risks
Potential for technical errors or system failures, though none reported in this series.
Consideration of patient comorbidities and prior abdominal surgeries in surgical planning.
Patient & Prescribing Data
32 women undergoing robotic gynecological surgery at two tertiary centers
Robotic surgery with HUGO™ RAS system is feasible and versatile for a range of benign and malignant gynecological procedures with acceptable operative times and perioperative outcomes.
Clinical Best Practices
Ensure comprehensive surgeon training including e-learning and wet lab practice before clinical implementation.
Adhere to standardized port placement and docking protocols to optimize operative efficiency.
Use appropriate uterine manipulators based on surgical indication to facilitate procedure.
Maintain pneumoperitoneum at 8 mmHg and use 30° or 0° endoscope depending on procedure type.
Monitor operative metrics and complications systematically to guide quality improvement.