New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers - Scorecard - MDSpire

New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers

  • By

  • Margarita Afonina

  • Claudia Collà Ruvolo

  • Giorgia Gaia

  • Marco Paciotti

  • Giovanni Leva

  • Anna Maria Marconi

  • Koen Traen

  • Alexandre Mottrie

  • June 10, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Exploring Advances in Gynecological Surgery: Initial Insights from the HUGO™ Robotic Surgery System at Two Tertiary Referral Centers

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBenign and malignant gynecological conditions including endometrial hyperplasia, leiomyomas, benign ovarian tumors, endometriosis, pelvic organ prolapse, and endometrial cancer
Key MechanismsRobotic-assisted surgery using the HUGO™ RAS system providing 3D visualization, precision, and enhanced freedom of movement with a 4-arm configuration
Target PopulationWomen undergoing gynecological surgery at tertiary referral centers
Care SettingTertiary referral hospitals with multiplatform robotic surgery capabilities

Key Highlights

  • The HUGO™ RAS system was adopted in 2021 and used for 32 gynecological procedures between March 2022 and April 2023.
  • Procedures included hysterectomy (62.5%), adnexal surgery (21.9%), and pelvic floor surgery ± supracervical hysterectomy (15.6%).
  • Median docking time was 8 minutes, console time varied by procedure type, and no major system failures or conversions were reported.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Patient selection based on gynecological indication including benign and malignant conditions.
  • Preoperative assessment including age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and surgical history.

Management

  • Use of HUGO™ RAS system with a 4-arm setup and specific port placements as per Medtronic guidelines.
  • Dedicated surgeon training including e-learning and wet lab practice prior to clinical use.
  • Patient positioning in Lloyd Davies 20° Trendelenburg with uterine manipulators tailored to procedure type.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Recording docking, console, and skin-to-skin times for operative efficiency assessment.
  • Monitoring perioperative complications using Clavien–Dindo classification.
  • Tracking instrument clashing, technical errors, system failures, estimated blood loss, catheter removal day, and length of stay.

Risks

  • Potential for technical errors or system failures, though none reported in this series.
  • Consideration of patient comorbidities and prior abdominal surgeries in surgical planning.

Patient & Prescribing Data

32 women undergoing robotic gynecological surgery at two tertiary centers

Robotic surgery with HUGO™ RAS system is feasible and versatile for a range of benign and malignant gynecological procedures with acceptable operative times and perioperative outcomes.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Ensure comprehensive surgeon training including e-learning and wet lab practice before clinical implementation.
  • Adhere to standardized port placement and docking protocols to optimize operative efficiency.
  • Use appropriate uterine manipulators based on surgical indication to facilitate procedure.
  • Maintain pneumoperitoneum at 8 mmHg and use 30° or 0° endoscope depending on procedure type.
  • Monitor operative metrics and complications systematically to guide quality improvement.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content