Personalised modelling of routine variability and affective states - Scorecard - MDSpire

Personalised modelling of routine variability and affective states

  • By

  • Adrien Choi

  • Danielle Lottridge

  • Jim Warren

  • October 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Customized Analysis of Daily Routine Variability and Emotional States

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionAnxiety and Depression
Key MechanismsVariability in daily routines across life aspects as personalised digital markers linked to self-reported affective states
Target PopulationIndividuals monitored via smartphone sensor data, including college students
Care SettingDigital health monitoring and potential clinical psychology/neuropsychiatry settings

Key Highlights

  • Multimodal smartphone sensor data can reveal individual-specific routine patterns associated with anxiety and depression symptoms.
  • Non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) and generalized linear models (GLMs) enable personalised modelling of routine variability linked to mental health states.
  • Large language models (LLMs) can translate complex modelling results into accessible language to support self-understanding and potential self-regulation.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use multimodal smartphone sensor data to capture granular behavioural patterns over time.
  • Apply non-negative matrix factorisation to decompose behavioural data into individual routines and their variability.
  • Employ personalised generalized linear models to associate routine variability with anxiety and depression symptoms.

Management

  • Leverage personalised digital phenotypes and digital twins to monitor and potentially intervene in behavioural patterns.
  • Use LLM-generated interpretations to support patient engagement and self-regulation strategies.
  • Consider group-based interventions informed by routine similarity patterns among individuals.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Continuously collect and analyze smartphone sensor data to track routine variability and mental health changes.
  • Monitor intermediate behavioural outcomes as proxies for mental health states to inform early intervention.
  • Validate behavioural markers with clinical expertise to enhance reliability and applicability.

Risks

  • Potential information bias from self-reported questionnaires necessitates objective sensor data integration.
  • Variability in routines may be influenced by external social and environmental factors complicating interpretation.
  • Privacy and data security concerns related to continuous digital behavioural monitoring.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Individuals with varying degrees of anxiety and depression symptoms monitored via smartphones

Personalised routine variability patterns can identify behavioural targets for intervention; LLMs facilitate patient understanding and engagement with their mental health data.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate multimodal sensor data for comprehensive behavioural assessment beyond traditional questionnaires.
  • Use machine learning techniques to capture temporal changes and variability in routines rather than static aggregates.
  • Translate complex analytic results into accessible language to empower patient self-management.
  • Group patients by similar behavioural phenotypes to tailor shared treatment strategies.
  • Validate digital behavioural markers with clinical expertise to ensure clinical relevance.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content