Updated AI and/or Machine Learning–Based Medical Devices Cleared Through the FDA 510(k) Pathway - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Updated AI/ML-Based Medical Devices Cleared via the FDA 510(k) Pathway

  • By

  • Maria Zogka

  • Melissa Amyx

  • Philippe Ravaud

  • Viet-Thi Tran

  • November 5, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Updated AI/ML-Based Medical Devices Cleared via the FDA 510(k) Pathway

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionPostclearance updates to AI/ML-based medical devices cleared through the FDA 510(k) pathway
Key MechanismsUpdates may alter device use through new features or changes to algorithm inputs, or improve algorithm performance through new data, neural networks, or architecture changes.
Target Population163 AI/ML-based medical devices initially cleared via the 510(k) pathway from May 12, 2015, through December 29, 2021, included in this cross-sectional analysis.
Care SettingFDA regulatory review and postclearance oversight; 89.0% of devices in the study were designed to analyze medical imaging data.

Key Highlights

  • Among 163 devices, 56 (34.4%) had at least one AI/ML algorithm update recorded in FDA 510(k) database entries.
  • The median interval to the first recorded update was 1.8 years (IQR, 0.9-2.5).
  • Among updated devices, 42 of 56 (75.0%) had at least one update that altered use relative to the preceding version.
  • Among 106 update-related entries, participant information was missing from 41 (38.7%) and sample size was missing from 38 (35.8%).
  • The authors recommend enhancing and standardizing reporting requirements and establishing and enforcing postdeployment monitoring.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Not applicable: this cross-sectional study examined FDA database records of AI/ML device updates, not diagnosis of a disease.

Management

  • Author recommendation: enhance and standardize reporting requirements for AI/ML device modifications and their performance.
  • Author recommendation: establish and enforce postdeployment monitoring to support ongoing device safety and effectiveness.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The study assessed FDA documentation of performance evaluations, including participant information, sample size, metrics, results, and organizational or clinical benefits.
  • The authors identify postdeployment monitoring as a needed component of ongoing oversight.

Risks

  • The authors state that heterogeneous or incomplete reporting may limit physicians’ and patients’ ability to evaluate and select AI/ML-based devices.
  • The analysis may not capture updates made without an associated FDA modification request, including changes permitted under FDA Predetermined Change Control Plan guidance.

Patient & Prescribing Data

No patient treatment cohort was studied. The analysis covered 163 AI/ML-based devices cleared from May 12, 2015, through December 29, 2021.

The study did not evaluate treatment. It found that performance-assessment and benefit information for device updates was often absent from FDA database entries.

Clinical Best Practices

    Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content