Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neurofilament Light Reference Intervals in Healthy Individuals - Scorecard - MDSpire

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neurofilament Light Reference Intervals in Healthy Individuals

  • By

  • Rebecca Z. Rousset

  • Madison I. J. Honey

  • Anouk den Braber

  • Wiesje M. van der Flier

  • Henne Holstege

  • Linda Lorenz

  • Mark H. J. Wessels

  • Joep Killestein

  • Martijn Huisman

  • Almar Kok

  • Marian Beekman

  • P. Eline Slagboom

  • Lannie Ligthart

  • Eco de Geus

  • Inge M. W. Verberk

  • Lisa Vermunt

  • Charlotte E. Teunissen

  • May 14, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Reference Ranges for Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neurofilament Light Chain in Healthy Subjects

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionNeurodegenerative diseases and neurological injuries
Key MechanismsGFAP as a biomarker of astrocyte injury; NfL as a biomarker of axonal injury
Target PopulationCognitively unimpaired adults aged 30 to 90 years
Care SettingClinical and research settings for neurological assessments

Key Highlights

  • GFAP and NfL concentrations are elevated in neurodegenerative diseases and after neurotrauma.
  • Age, sex, kidney function, and BMI are biological modifiers affecting GFAP and NfL levels.
  • Reference intervals for GFAP and NfL were established and validated using external datasets.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use GFAP and NfL concentrations to assess astrocyte and axonal injury in clinical settings.

Management

  • Consider biological modifiers when interpreting GFAP and NfL levels.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regularly monitor GFAP and NfL levels in patients with neurological conditions.

Risks

  • Be aware of the influence of age, sex, BMI, and kidney function on biomarker concentrations.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Cognitively unimpaired individuals from Dutch cohorts

Reference intervals can guide clinical interpretation of GFAP and NfL in patients.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize established reference intervals for GFAP and NfL in clinical assessments.
  • Incorporate patient-specific factors such as age and BMI into biomarker interpretation.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content