APT may fall short in pulsatile tinnitus - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

APT may fall short in pulsatile tinnitus

  • By

  • Andrea Surnit

  • October 9, 2026

  • 3 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: APT may fall short in pulsatile tinnitus

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSubjective pulsatile tinnitus
Key MechanismsAmbient pressure tympanometry (APT) assesses tympanometric waveform patterns for pulse synchrony; the study evaluated its ability to detect radiologic correlates and surgeon-defined diagnoses.
Target PopulationAdults with subjective pulsatile tinnitus who underwent APT at a tertiary care clinic.
Care SettingTertiary otolaryngology clinic; findings concern APT screening alongside imaging and clinical diagnosis.

Key Highlights

  • In 107 adults, APT sensitivity and specificity for any radiologic correlate were 51% and 57%, respectively.
  • Against surgeon-defined diagnoses, APT sensitivity was 43% and specificity was 55%.
  • Results were similar in the subgroup of 86 patients whose primary complaint was pulsatile tinnitus.
  • Some surgeon diagnoses had no identified radiologic correlate, including middle ear myoclonus and Eustachian tube dysfunction.
  • The study authors advised pursuing imaging regardless of a negative APT tracing.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Interpret APT results in the context of clinical assessment, imaging, and surgeon-defined diagnoses; the study found limited screening performance.

Management

  • Study authors recommended pursuing imaging even when the APT tracing is negative.

Monitoring & Follow-up

    Risks

    • A negative APT tracing may not exclude a radiologic correlate; sensitivity was 51% in the full cohort.
    • Radiologic interpretations and surgeon diagnoses did not always agree, and some diagnosed sources were not identifiable through imaging.

    Patient & Prescribing Data

    Retrospective single-center cohort of 107 adults with subjective pulsatile tinnitus who underwent APT from December 2021 through May 2025; a subgroup analysis included 86 patients with pulsatile tinnitus as the primary complaint.

    No treatment or prescribing outcomes were reported. APT had limited sensitivity and specificity for radiologic correlates and surgeon-defined diagnoses.

    Clinical Best Practices

    • Do not use a negative APT tracing alone to determine that imaging is unwarranted, consistent with the study authors’ recommendation.
    • Consider that radiologic findings may not capture all clinically diagnosed sources of pulsatile tinnitus.
    • Interpret the findings with awareness of the study’s retrospective, single-center design and variability in APT collection, classification, and imaging.

    Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content