Pediatric tularemia in Denmark: a forgotten disease - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Tularemia in Children: An Overlooked Infection in Denmark

  • By

  • Camilla Luise Thelin

  • Birgitte Smith

  • Thomas Ulrik Hoffmann

  • Karen Angeliki Krogfelt

  • September 1, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Tularemia in Children: An Overlooked Infection in Denmark

At a Glance

Category

Detail

Condition

Ulceroglandular tularemia

Key Mechanisms

Zoonotic infection caused by Francisella tularensis and transmitted through infected arthropod bites, direct animal contact, inhalation, or contaminated food or water.

Target Population

Children with persistent fever, regional lymphadenitis, and a possible inoculation ulcer, including those without a recalled exposure.

Care Setting

Pediatric clinical care in low-incidence or emerging areas.

Key Highlights

  • Denmark reported 109 laboratory-confirmed cases from 2013 through 2024 and 32 cases in 2025, although whether this reflects geographic expansion or increased recognition and testing remains uncertain.

  • Ulceroglandular tularemia, the most common form in Europe, is characterized by a punched-out inoculation ulcer and regional lymphadenopathy.

  • Both reported children were initially treated for presumed bacterial infection with beta-lactam antibiotics but did not improve.

  • Routine bacterial cultures may remain negative because F. tularensis is fastidious and requires specialized culture media and laboratory handling.

  • Serology and PCR have complementary diagnostic roles; antibodies may be undetectable early, whereas PCR of lymph node aspirates or biopsy specimens can provide earlier confirmation.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Consider tularemia in children with persistent fever and regional lymphadenitis, particularly after possible arthropod bites or animal exposure.

  • Absence of a recalled tick bite or wildlife contact does not exclude the diagnosis.

  • Look for an adjacent punched-out inoculation ulcer and use serology and PCR for microbiological confirmation.

Management

  • Reconsider the diagnosis when presumed bacterial lymphadenitis or soft tissue infection does not respond to beta-lactam therapy.

  • Doxycycline is commonly used; fluoroquinolones may be considered in more severe cases, with abscess formation, or when clinical response is inadequate.

  • Treatment should be individualized because the optimal duration of pediatric therapy remains uncertain.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor fever, lymphadenopathy, inoculation-ulcer healing, and development of lymph node suppuration.

  • Assess clinical response throughout treatment because prolonged courses may be required in complicated cases.

Risks

  • Delayed diagnosis is associated with prolonged illness, persistent lymphadenopathy, and increased risk of suppuration requiring drainage.

  • F. tularensis is intrinsically resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics.

Patient & Prescribing Data

The report described two boys, aged 10 and 13 years. One improved after doxycycline was changed to ciprofloxacin; the other achieved fever resolution and progressive ulcer healing after 4 weeks of doxycycline. The relative contributions of antimicrobial modification, treatment duration, and the natural disease course could not be determined in the first case.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Consider tularemia when fever and regional lymphadenitis persist despite beta-lactam treatment.

  • Examine the corresponding drainage area for a punched-out inoculation ulcer.

  • Obtain a detailed exposure history while recognizing that arthropod bites or animal contact may not be recalled.

  • Use serology and PCR as complementary tests and initiate appropriate individualized antimicrobial therapy promptly.

Related Resources & Content

  • Ellis J, Oyston PCF, Green M, Titball RW. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(4):631–646.

  • Hestvik G, Warns-Petit E, Smith LA, et al. The status of tularemia in Europe in a one-health context: A review. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143(10):2137–2160.

  • Christensen CE, Horsholt K, Aftab H, et al. Tularæmi [Tularaemia]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2025;187(21):V11240819.

  • Johansson A, Berglund L, Eriksson U, et al. Comparative study of doxycycline and ciprofloxacin for treatment of tularemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(2):267–273.

  • Ørbæk M, Lebech AM, Helleberg M. The clinical spectrum of tularemia—two cases. IDCases. 2020;21:e00890.

  • Haulrig MB, Mathiasen G, Nielsen RM, Kromann CB, Krogfelt KA, Wiese L. Two cases of tick-borne transmitted tularemia on Southern Zealand, Denmark. APMIS. 2020;128(1):61–64.

  • Gustafsson F, Fjordside L, Harritshøj LH, et al. A nationwide seroprevalence study of Francisella tularensis in Denmark. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2026;17(2):102625.

  • Arnold B, Trawinski H, Kellner N, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment strategies in a cohort of patients with tularemia: A retrospective multicenter analysis of 65 cases in Germany. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025;14(11):1169.

Original Source(s)

Related Content