Open Access Has a Dirty Secret, Surgical Editors Say
Surgery journal editors outline recommendations to address cost disparities affecting LMIC and unfunded researchers
By
Kerri Miller
April 1, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Open Access Has a Dirty Secret, Surgical Editors Say
At a Glance
Category Detail
Condition Open Access Publishing Challenges
Key Mechanisms Shift of publication costs from readers to authors through article processing charges (APC).
Target Population Authors, particularly from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and unfunded investigators globally.
Care Setting Academic and research institutions.
Key Highlights
APCs can limit participation in scholarly publishing for researchers in LMIC. Standard APCs vary significantly based on geographic purchasing power. 50% of surgical journals now operate under open or hybrid models. Major medical publishers report revenues exceeding $10 billion. Equitable access to publishing impacts scientific representation and patient care.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Identify barriers to publication for authors in LMIC.
Management
Waive APCs for authors from low-income countries and LMICs. Minimize fees for researchers without grant or institutional support.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Assess the impact of APC waivers on publication rates and diversity.
Risks
Potential misuse of authorship to avoid charges.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Authors and researchers in surgical fields.
Transformative agreements may facilitate OA publishing but often have caps on fees.
Clinical Best Practices
Implement transparent waiver policies for APCs. Define minimal fees clearly to prevent misuse.
References