Comparison of Stability Between Panoptix and AT Lisa Trifocal Intraocular Lenses with Distinct Haptic Designs Utilizing the iTrace System - Scorecard - MDSpire

Comparison of Stability Between Panoptix and AT Lisa Trifocal Intraocular Lenses with Distinct Haptic Designs Utilizing the iTrace System

  • By

  • Dilek Yasa

  • Husna Topcu

  • Mevlut Celal Ocal

  • Mehmet Altun

  • Gonul Karatas Durusoy

  • Bulent Kose

  • February 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Comparison of Stability Between Panoptix and AT Lisa Trifocal Intraocular Lenses with Distinct Haptic Designs Utilizing the iTrace System

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionCataract with corneal astigmatism requiring trifocal toric intraocular lens implantation
Key MechanismsRotational stability of trifocal toric IOLs influenced by haptic design (C-loop vs. plate) and material (hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic acrylic) affecting postoperative visual outcomes
Target PopulationPatients over 50 years old with regular corneal astigmatism >0.80 D, mesopic pupil 3.0–5.5 mm, seeking spectacle independence
Care SettingOphthalmic surgical centers performing refractive lens exchange with trifocal toric IOL implantation

Key Highlights

  • Trifocal toric IOLs correct distance, intermediate, and near vision simultaneously, addressing presbyopia and astigmatism.
  • Rotational instability of toric IOLs can cause residual astigmatism and visual disturbances such as halos and reduced contrast sensitivity.
  • The iTrace system provides objective, efficient postoperative assessment of toric IOL rotational alignment.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Perform comprehensive preoperative ophthalmological examination including visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit lamp, and fundus exam.
  • Assess corneal topography and biometry to quantify astigmatism and ocular biometrics.
  • Use iTrace or equivalent objective measurement tools for postoperative toric IOL alignment evaluation.

Management

  • Select trifocal toric IOL type based on patient biometric parameters and surgeon-patient discussion of lens characteristics.
  • Consider haptic design and material properties when choosing IOL to optimize rotational stability.
  • Aim for spectacle independence by minimizing residual astigmatism through precise IOL alignment.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Conduct postoperative assessments using iTrace system to monitor IOL rotational stability.
  • Evaluate for visual disturbances such as halos or reduced contrast sensitivity that may indicate IOL rotation.
  • Regular follow-up to detect and manage any IOL misalignment or residual refractive error.

Risks

  • Rotational instability leading to residual astigmatism and decreased visual quality.
  • Potential visual disturbances including halos and reduced contrast sensitivity with IOL misalignment.
  • Limitations in detecting subtle rotational differences due to variability in measurement and sample size.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients over 50 years with regular corneal astigmatism >0.80 D desiring spectacle independence

Both PanOptix (C-loop, hydrophobic acrylic) and AT Lisa (plate haptic, hydrophilic acrylic) trifocal toric IOLs are commonly used; selection should consider rotational stability influenced by haptic design and material.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use objective measurement systems like iTrace for accurate postoperative assessment of toric IOL rotation.
  • Discuss with patients the advantages and disadvantages of different trifocal toric IOL designs prior to surgery.
  • Exclude patients with irregular astigmatism, ocular comorbidities, or prior ocular surgeries to optimize outcomes.
  • Perform power analysis to ensure adequate sample size for detecting clinically meaningful differences in IOL rotation in studies.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content