Deep learning models for radiography body-part classification and chest radiograph projection/orientation classification: a multi-institutional study - Scorecard - MDSpire

Deep learning models for radiography body-part classification and chest radiograph projection/orientation classification: a multi-institutional study

  • By

  • Yasuhito Mitsuyama

  • Hirotaka Takita

  • Shannon L. Walston

  • Ko Watanabe

  • Shoya Ishimaru

  • Yukio Miki

  • Daiju Ueda

  • October 22, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Utilizing Deep Learning for Classification of Body-Part Radiographs and Chest X-ray Orientation: Insights from a Multi-Institutional Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionRadiographic image classification and quality control
Key MechanismsDeep-learning models classify body parts and chest X-ray projection and rotation to improve dataset labeling accuracy
Target PopulationAdult patients (≥18 years) undergoing radiographic imaging
Care SettingRadiology departments across multiple institutions and large-scale datasets

Key Highlights

  • Development and external validation of two deep-learning models: Xp-Bodypart-Checker for body part classification and CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker for chest X-ray projection and rotation detection.
  • Use of large, multi-institutional, and multinational datasets including institutional data and public datasets (MURA, CheXpert, PadChest) to enhance model generalizability.
  • Automated detection of mislabeled or rotated radiographs addresses critical quality control challenges in large heterogeneous radiograph repositories.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Utilize deep-learning models to classify radiographic body parts accurately before downstream analysis.
  • Apply automated projection and rotation detection to chest radiographs to ensure correct image orientation.

Management

  • Incorporate automated quality control steps in radiograph data preprocessing pipelines to detect and correct labeling errors.
  • Use multi-institutional datasets for training to improve model robustness and generalizability.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regularly validate model performance across diverse clinical settings and datasets.
  • Monitor for mislabeled or rotated images that may compromise deep-learning model training and diagnostic accuracy.

Risks

  • Manual or semi-automated metadata entry errors can lead to mislabeled images affecting model reliability.
  • Inclusion of rotated or incorrectly oriented images may degrade deep-learning analysis performance.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adult patients undergoing radiographic imaging across multiple institutions and public datasets

Automated classification models improve data quality and reliability of radiograph-based deep-learning diagnostic tools, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Verify and correct DICOM metadata labels with expert radiologist review to establish accurate ground truth for model training.
  • Use balanced datasets with equal distribution of image rotations to train rotation detection models effectively.
  • Employ multi-institutional and multinational datasets to ensure model applicability across diverse populations and imaging protocols.
  • Implement automated quality control to detect mislabeled or misoriented images prior to deep-learning model training and validation.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content