Why Better Care Needs Better Connections - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Why Better Care Needs Better Connections

  • By

  • Atlas McNeil Healthcare Community

  • October 29, 2026

  • 5 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Why Better Care Needs Better Connections

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionCare coordination and communication across healthcare teams
Key MechanismsInformation gaps, delayed or inaccessible test results, incomplete handoffs, and fragmented records can contribute to duplicated testing, delayed follow-up, medication conflicts, and complications.
Target PopulationPatients receiving care from multiple clinicians or services, particularly those transitioning from hospital to home with ongoing clinical needs.
Care SettingCross-setting care, including hospitals, outpatient follow-up, and home care.

Key Highlights

  • The article reports that communication failures have been implicated as a root cause in more than 70% of sentinel events reported in US hospitals, citing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • Care coordination gaps can contribute to duplicated testing, delayed follow-up on abnormal results, and medication conflicts.
  • Transitions from hospital to home can require coordinated clinical and laboratory monitoring, including phosphate, potassium, and magnesium monitoring for patients receiving tube feeding.
  • Structured handoffs, multidisciplinary case reviews, clear escalation protocols, and patient engagement are described as practical coordination approaches.
  • Shared care plans and interoperable electronic health records and laboratory information systems can support information exchange across care settings.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The article does not provide diagnostic criteria or a diagnostic guideline.

Management

  • The article describes standardizing evidence-based care pathways so team members work from shared protocols.
  • Use structured handoff tools, such as standardized discharge summaries and shift-change checklists, to communicate pending results and follow-up requirements.
  • Hold multidisciplinary case reviews to interpret findings with clinical context.
  • Establish protocols specifying how, when, and to whom critical or abnormal results are escalated.
  • Use shared care plans and interoperable electronic health records and laboratory information systems to support information access across care settings.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The article describes biochemical monitoring of phosphate, potassium, and magnesium in the first few weeks for patients discharged on tube feeding as part of safe home enteral nutrition management.
  • Audit turnaround times, handoff completion, and follow-up rates to identify coordination breakdowns.

Risks

  • The article cites research estimating that inadequate care coordination and poorly managed care transitions account for $25 billion to $45 billion in unnecessary annual US spending, much of it tied to communication breakdowns rather than clinical error.
  • Communication failures and fragmented care can contribute to delayed follow-up, duplicated testing, and medication conflicts.
  • Late laboratory results, or results sent to a clinician who is not adjusting the relevant treatment, can disrupt care transitions.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients whose care involves multiple teams or transitions between hospital, outpatient, and home settings; the article gives home enteral nutrition as an example.

No medication prescribing regimen is provided. The article recommends clear, plain-language communication with patients and caregivers about test results, care plans, and next steps.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Share relevant clinical context with laboratory results and ensure results reach the clinician responsible for acting on them.
  • Include pending results and follow-up requirements in structured handoffs.
  • Engage patients and caregivers in understanding and following the care plan.
  • Use regular multidisciplinary reviews and defined escalation pathways for critical or abnormal results.
  • Review coordination processes using audits of turnaround times, handoff completion, and follow-up rates.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content